• Jack@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    This made me think because raiding peoples homes doesn’t seem right, but saying things like this definitely isn’t right.

    In the end I think a inclusive society should exclude it’s exclusive elements.

    • PLAVAT🧿S@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel we just can’t agree on this argument online, and it’s likely because the line for tolerance differs on so many factors, history being a huge one.

      I’m aware German laws exist to ban fascist symbols, likely as an ounce of prevention along the lines, “we won’t repeat another Hitler”.

      It might take the US falling into a fascist state and being liberated to make us adopt such “drastic” measures as raids. Until then 1A has been routinely held up to protect hate speech so for now it’s up to us as a society to make a conscious decision what we’ll tolerate. We just have to be as vocal about it as the racists/fascists.

      • Pirasp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The raids were probably because of the threats and not because of antisemitic remarks. The first might get you arrested if you scream it in the streets, but threatening people should get you raided imho