Mailed ballots that arrive on time but in envelopes without dates handwritten by Pennsylvania voters should be counted, a federal judge ruled Tuesday in a case that’s likely to end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge Susan Paradise Baxter is expected to be appealed to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals before it ultimately reaches the high court, whose final word on what are often referred to as “undated ballots” may help determine the outcome of the 2024 presidential race and other key upcoming elections in the swing state.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    If the ballot arrived on time, why should it matter what date is hand-written on it? Our state doesn’t even require that, just a signature to determine that the person voting is the person registered.

    • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because then Republicans can justify throwing it out if it doesn’t favor them. It doesn’t have to make sense as long as they can have it declared legal.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s the thing though… the date is on the outside of the envelope. They would be discarding ballots blindly. Makes no sense.

        • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          They aren’t really discarding them blindly though. There’s currently a preference among democrats to use mail in voting compared to Republicans. It used to be the other way around, but many Republicans, Trump especially, continue to tell their followers not to use mail in voting. So yes some of the votes they throw out will be republican votes, but more will be democratic. So throwing them all out throws out more democratic votes than Republicans and helps them. Similarly in states where democrats are making more use of early in person or drop off voting, republicans are trying to restrict those methods.

          Republicans are constantly trying to implement “fair” rules that disenfranchise many voters but are blatantly crafted to proportionally decrease democratic votes more than Republican ones. Another good example is Texas’s ridiculous rule of one ballot drop off box per county. Meaning the small rural counties that vote heavily republican get one drop box, but there’s less people so this isn’t too much of a problem. Meanwhile, heavily democratic Harris County (containing Houston) with 4.8 million people, more than a lot of entire states, is only allowed one single ballot drop off box too. I think you can see how this “fair” rule that applies to everyone is crafted to hurt democratic voters more, like all the republican voter suppression efforts. They look for any discrepancy between how republicans and democrats access voting, and then pounce on those.