• Danny M@lemmy.escapebigtech.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s remember, fellas, that big tech is not a disease that needs to be eradicated. Let us not forget that Google is a legitimate corporation, not merely a group of professional stalkers. And let’s be clear: obviously you are the crazy ones for worrying about this, naturally…

    Pardon my jest; I was merely echoing the absurdities often heard.

    Maybe just maybe it’s time we stop with this garbage and actually stop using their services. Nothing will change if we keep using their services.

    The most direct and effective strategy to inspire reform in their practices is to stop using of their platforms. Each time we use a service from Google or any similar big tech entity, we inadvertently endorse their methods.

    YOU hold the power to change them by using FOSS alternatives instead.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The most direct and effective strategy to inspire reform in their practices is to stop using of their platforms.

      The whole “the free market could fix it” is just neoliberal bullshit. The most hated companies in the world continue to bring in record profits and its not because people prefer their chocolate is harvested by child slaves.

      They’re fully aware that it never works, but they just keep suggesting it over and over again, growing richer with successive failure, all the while blaming consumers for not preventing them doing sleazy, greedy things.

      The actual most direct and effective strategy is regulations. That’s why they hate them and why there are so many of them in politics.

      • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you. I’m tired of hearing “it’s the consumer’s responsability” when we have governments and various regulatory bodies for this exact reason

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but the problem is the convenience.

      Google has made their services convenient, which is why everyone I like to watch content of posts their stuff on YouTube. Both alternive websites and the content on them is often of inferior quality and difficult to find.

      • Danny M@lemmy.escapebigtech.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Then use alternative youtube clients, like piped or freetube.

        Or even better: spend money (if you can afford it) to host a peertube instance that automatically rips the videos off of youtube.

        That’s an even stronger message that you’d rather spend money than use their crappy free services.

        • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or even better: spend money (if you can afford it) to host a peertube instance that automatically rips the videos off of youtube.

          Oh that’s amazing. I’m gonna see about doing that for channels I actively watch. Gives me an excuse to unfuck my NAS storage too since then it’ll be full faster.

          Do you know of any software that does that already (I assume PeerTube itself doesn’t)?

        • Frost-752@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Didnt know this could be done, looks like ive got something new to throw on the home server.

          • Danny M@lemmy.escapebigtech.info
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            it’s not cheap, but it’s not prohibitively expensive either, unless you watch a prohibitive amount of youtube (i.e. you watch youtube 24/7)

            You can get a 10TB hard drive for slightly under 200 dollars today, then just throw it in an old computer (even if the parts are 10+ years old, it’s fine), install a linux distro and install peertube.

        • Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Piped doesn’t work most of the time. In fact, I can’t remember a single Piped link actually loading the video. And I don’t have money to spend.

      • jeremyparker@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        which is why everyone I like to watch content of posts their stuff on YouTube

        I’m not sure this is exactly true - like, first off, I am not a YouTuber and I only watch a very specific kind of content there (breadtube), so idk if my opinion is valid, but

        From what I’ve heard creators say, it’s not that YouTube is great, in fact it kind of sucks in a lot of ways, it’s just that the alternatives don’t do it better, and obviously don’t have the size & reach. All the things that YouTube does badly or not at all, the competition doesn’t do well either, so why bother.

        You’re 100% right tho that Google’s success at this point hinges almost entirely on their convenience. Google drive/docs/sheets/etc are kinda garbage, but they’te fast, simple to use, and the integration is incredibly smooth. If there was any alternative that was as simple to transition into from email or whatever, I’d jump ship in a second.

      • Wiz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Offering a free convenient service is the first step of enshittification.

        [Side eye at Bluesky]

        • deur@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Under the same logic we can say that Lemmy is in its first stage of enshittification, lol. You need to refine the criteria.

      • steltek@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You described a straight up better product. That’s not convenience. You said it yourself: alternatives have worse quality.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Actually, the main problem isn’t that they’ve made their services convenient. Most of them are inconvenient in multiple ways.

        The really big problem, the absolutely INSIDIOUS shit is how extremely inconvenient they’ve made using alternatives.

        Example: Google the search engine straight up sucks from an end user perspective now. Yet because it’s where over 90% of all search engine searches happen, it’s MORE inconvenient to use any other one, no matter how much better the algorithms and what have you.

        Same with YouTube: the user experience becomes worse and worse, but since it has a de facto near-monopoly of certain types of content from certain creators, best you can do is a custom frontend. Which they’re of course trying to make impossible ever since they removed the “Don’t” from their original informal slogan.