RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up11.18Karrow-down123cross-posted to: socialismglobalnews@lemmy.zipnews@hexbear.netnews@beehaw.orgworldnewsfinance@beehaw.orgeconomicsenvironment@beehaw.org
arrow-up11.16Karrow-down1external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comRandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square108fedilinkcross-posted to: socialismglobalnews@lemmy.zipnews@hexbear.netnews@beehaw.orgworldnewsfinance@beehaw.orgeconomicsenvironment@beehaw.org
minus-squareGiveMemes@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoAlmost definitely worse lol. We have the option to modify the genome of the plants we eat in order to make then better in every way and still some people are like “no that’s icky because science”.
minus-squaresixCats@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoGMO != organic as far as I know?
minus-squareGiveMemes@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIn the US organic means no GMOs as well according to usda
Almost definitely worse lol. We have the option to modify the genome of the plants we eat in order to make then better in every way and still some people are like “no that’s icky because science”.
GMO != organic as far as I know?
In the US organic means no GMOs as well according to usda