And I cannot stress this enough: bury their bones in an unmarked ditch.

Those are original Warhol boxes. Two Brillos, a Motts and a Campbells tomato soup. Multiple millions worth of original art, set on the floor by the front door.

Theres a regular customer whom i do plumbing work for, for the last 3 or 4 years. These belong to her. She also has Cherub Riding a Stag, and a couple other Warhols that i cannot identify, along with other originals by other artists that i also cannot identify. I have to go back to her house this coming Monday, i might get photos of the rest of her art, just so i can figure out what it is.

Even though i dont have an artistic bone in my entire body, i can appreciate art. I have negative feelings on private art like this that im too dumb to elucidate on.

eat the fucking rich. they are good for nothing.

  • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We can only dream of aspiring to the awe-inspiring greatness and high level thinking of taking an undergrad art course

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Performatively praising Great Men is a big part of the “in group” in humanities departments.

      In the overlap between literature and performance arts, “bardology” is like a malignant tumor that chokes the resources out of anything not Shakespeare, for example. And God help you if you mention anything negative about Shakespeare (such as libertarian-alert ) or his Tudor patrons (that were definitely pleased by the character assassination of Richard III) for any reason.

      • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Funny how every creep eventually turns to “anti-intellectualism” as their weapon of defense. The French are experts at this today.

        Was everyone who criticized “Cuties” anti-intellectual?

        It doesn’t really speak to the strength of someone’s position when they have to just depart from the critiques themselves to brandish buzzwords. If your position is strong you should be able to defend it while sticking to the art in question.

        If I criticize you it’s because I’m a shrewd critic. If you criticize me it’s because you’re anti-intellectual.

        No, my pedophillic fantasy novel isn’t gross, and by criticizing it you’re being the same as literal Nazis (who doesn’t love a little Nazi trivialization?)

        • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “You can’t criticize or even dislike the rich connected fed-funded very smartists or their treats or else you are not very smartist.” smuglord

          • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Yeah well conservatives also said rap was bad. Care to reconsider your ‘graphic sex scenes between a 12 year old and a 50 year old are bad’ position?”

            • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Also your criticism is itself a vindicating performance art piece! Dance, unwashed barbarian puppets! Dance for the glory of the abusive sex pest auteurs!” smuglord