• Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Woodbury, MN has a couple sections around that and another section at over 5800%. And I believe that’s over the proposed limits, not over minimum reporting levels.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I went by the explanation on the map.

      This map shows water systems included in the EPA’s records, as of Nov. 9. It’s based on boundaries developed by SimpleLab, a water-testing company. Click on a system to see the number of pollutants detected at or above the EPA’s minimum reporting levels and by what percent they exceeded those limits.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh ok, I was going by the legend text and assumed incorrectly about what “limit” meant. Though I’m not sure there is a maximum or if anything over the minimum reporting limit is unsafe.

        • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I believe “minimum reporting levels” is just the level at which everything must be reported by the state to the EPA (so below the minimum level would not need to be reported).