Really, chloe?

  • David Palmer@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The slogan isn’t calling for a genocide, it’s calling for freedom for Palestinians. That isn’t anti-Semitic. It’s just bad faith to conflate Palestinian human rights with a genocide against Israelis. Human rights aren’t a zero-sum game, everyone can have them.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry, but you’re wrong there. The translation tames things a bit, but the original slogan, along with the Hamas charter it’s drawn from, call for the outright extermination of Israel.

      • David Palmer@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And Hamas are miserable anti-Semitic goons that are an armed minority and do not represent the interests of most Palestinians.

        Interestingly the phrase was originally used by Likud in 1977 in an election charter: “between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty”. If this phrase is a call to genocide the knife cuts both ways.

          • David Palmer@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Personally, I don’t use it, because I’ve heard from some Jewish people I know that they find it offensive or alienating. But for me I’m not bothered with pro-Palestinian activists using it either.

      • CommanderCloon
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Saying that the country of Israel should not exist is not antisemitic.