• UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Privatisation hounds do the same shit all over: enshittify a public service then offer a private alternative as a kind of shitty trojan savoir to the problem they created

    • SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because it isn’t? It’s up by about 6%. The numbers are more accurate as well.

      Frankly, even if your statement was correct, it would be the equivalent of asking why only people who go to the doctor have cancer.

      Lastly, if we are throwing out random facts and trying to extrapolate the value of a system, why is Cuba’s literacy rate always close to 100%?

      • Bgugi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Official government numbers, of an authoritarian government that considers it’s education system a point of pride, self-reported in government census, by citizens afraid to criticize their government, after being filtered for those that received formal education.

        Sounds a lot like the North Korean voter turnout to me…

        • SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Some of what you said is true, some of it is bull shit. The numbers have been corraberated by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, as well as World Bank. Cuban’s really do have an exceptionally high, near 100%, literacy rate. Though many are at what America would call an “advanced first grade level”. So its not exactly perfect. But percentage wise, almost all Cubans can read. Which can’t be said for American citizens.

          However, their education system does strongly push political beliefs, so it is not simply for the betterment of the citizens. It tries to encourage a world view favorable to the government. Using literacy as a way to teach “what to think”. (Not that the United States can throw stones from our glass house… I pledge allegiance, to the flag, of the United States, etc. etc).

          That being said, to compare Cuba to North Korea is hyperbolic to the extent that it is obvious you are either trying to be inflammatory, or are simply clueless.

          Regardless, my point was that the value of something can not be pulled from a single data point. So in your haste to discredit a country you dislike, you kinda helped me prove my original point, so thanks!

          P.S. What’s wrong with the education system being a point of pride? I wish the US took more pride in ours frankly.

    • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably some combination of our definition of literacy being adjusted, and the availability of more accurate data about populations and how educated they are.

      • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        The bastians of the homeschooling movement that allows household chores to be considered curriculum because of a campaigned for lack of oversight is also where there are low literacy rates? Say it isn’t so…