• Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean the frustration is real, but the channels are what are accused of being engineered.

    The don’t vote and protest vote crowds are basically purpose built to make it as hard as possible for America to even slow itself down, let alone begin reversing course.

    “I have serious objections to the major legacies of discrimination and failures to address poverty in this country! Let’s take the exact actions that make it more likely for power to end up in the hands of the people who think the problem is we’re not doing enough of that!”

    That is the narrative people accuse Russia and China of spreading, and it’s hardly a coincidence that this crescendos in exactly two times, 1) just before an election, and 2) just after a major consequence comes down as a result of the election that was meddled with.

    • Meldroc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty sure that at least at the Old Place, despair-trolling is very much a thing,

      Right-wing boiler-room operations, Putin’s troll farms, and independent dick heads have lots of reasons to sow apathy and despair.

      • TheHolyChecksum@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you discussing ways of fixing your political system in your third spaces? Are you organizing grassroots political movements that want to break the status quo and the class wars? Or are you just antagonizing everyone on the internet over a zero-sum choice you made up in your head? Or maybe you’re just agitating because you find it funny? Either way, you are not contributing positively to this issue, and your tribalism shows.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t the “vote for Genocide Joe he’s the lesser of two evils” win last time? How’s that going for the votées?

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same as always. Badly, but not as badly as if we had voted to end democracy with Trump.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          Marching slowly towards a cliff is no better than doing it quickly. Unless the course is changed the outcome will be the same.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That doesn’t mean it’s okay to sprint off the edge without a parachute. Of course we’re working to change course too. It’s not an overnight thing.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well he’s one of the most productive presidents in modern history even in spite of the congressional odds stacked against him, so pretty well all things considered.

        How are all those judges that Trump got to appoint because of the pretentious assholes who insist on calling Biden “Genocide Joe” doing?

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You know you’re talking to a real leftist when they walk right up to the line of unironically quoting “orange man bad”

            That’s a line that a real leftist would totally be able to choke out before instinctively committing ritual suicide out of how idiotic it would be to say that.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m just simplifying your amazing arguments that are so morally void that the only reason you’re defending one party is that the other party is worse.

              I’m not stupid enough to vote for either of those parties.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For those that are curious, this is possible because the US has monetary sovereignty in a fiat currency. This means that the federal government is able to allocate literally trillions of dollars more than the annual budget without harming the economy in any way, because a vast majority of US debt (and deficit) is to the US federal government.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Thanks for the podcast recommendation! I’ve been needing more things to listen to during work

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every country I know about has a fiat currency, but the monetary sovereignty bit is also important. Governments within the EU don’t have monetary sovereignty, and therefore are limited by taxation. The EU as a whole could do the same thing, because they are the body that controls the Euro.

      • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you talk about currencies that are backed in gold, then none. The last country to abolish the Gold standard was Switzerland at some point in the 1990s.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        What are you confused about? This is basic Modern Monetary Theory. The US government just decides that funding genocide is more worthwhile than helping the citizens.

      • FastAndBulbous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s completely garbage economics. Some innumerate people think that printing money indefinitely won’t lead to hyper inflation.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Enslaved? Afaik the US government has willingly funded Israel as part of their strategy for years.

      And not only are you getting that twisted, you’re also trivializing slavery while villifying a group for something they did not do.

      I have no stake in this war, but I do want to point out that your choice of words is very inaccurate and inappropriate.

      • applejacks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        bro, do you know how much of the US govt is jewish and/or zionist?

        if you say anything criticizing them, AIPAC will donate tons of money to your opponent.

        https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1717700125512913232

        The Senate just UNANIMOUSLY adopted a resolution condemning pro-Palestine student protesters as “in solidarity with Hamas” and anti-semitic. The resolution calls to “fully and completely support Israel” in its war on Gaza

        Everyone from Bernie Sanders to Rand Paul voted for this

    • Torvum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      This kind of thinking makes you morally obligated to stop paying taxes (I’m for it)

      • pflanzenregal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A more constructive conclusion would be to actually improve things, by not eliminating taxes but spending them differently.

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think a good first step would be an Aus style bill that breaks down how your tax dollars got spent by the share of the budget that went to whatever we spent money on.

          Actually seeing how much money went to foreign aid or debt repayments or MIC contracts would at least start an informed discourse on how are taxes get spent

        • Torvum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Won’t happen unless immediate and immense pressure is applied to politicians. Such as threatening their livelihood by not paying taxes (their paycheck)

          Or you know, violence. It’s easy to beg for change, but without action they are under no obligation to do anything.

    • pflanzenregal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      There I was, thinking people on Lemmy might me smarter than on Reddit… Regarding most comments, not just yours.

      • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If anything Lemmy is even worse. At least on Reddit you could find niche subs where uninformed or objectively stupid comments would be ruthlessly downvoted and it was only the big subs where one would encounter the idiot masses with their mob mentality.

        Lemmy doesn’t have any niche subs like that, at least not yet, or not that I’m aware of. Accordingly, the signal to noise ratio here sucks. The gibbering idiot masses almost entirely drown out the few intelligent, well-informed and thoughtful comments there are.

  • MuuuaadDib@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Israeli disinformation and social media battalions are out in force and moving into decision roles on platforms. I was banned for telling a troll I hope when karma finds him he remembers his cheering of children dying. That was a ban for me…seriously horrible people.

  • Iceman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why does Israel need the money? They have one of the worlds best trained and equipped armies in the world. They have state of the art technology and they are fighting an irregular gerillas armed with rpg and home made rockets.

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The IDF doesn’t want to risk the lives of their own soldiers, so they prefer to sacrifice thousands of children instead. Sending in a ground force of occupiers would likely minimize civilian deaths, but it would lead to many more Israeli soldiers losing their lives. That’s why they prefer artillery attacks. Palestinian children are expendable compared to mandatory Israeli conscripts.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s how you know that even the Israelis don’t agree with this war. This would be like if Bush hesitated to invade Afghanistan because of how much shit would hit the fan when coffins started coming back and Americans started demanding to know why US soldiers should be dying for the sake of…well at that point it actually just was straight up a militarized manhunt for one guy so…

  • spookedbyroaches@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s funny because people now are way more depressed than during the literal constant wars in europe. Just a few years ago, we had nothing but small sporadic conflicts, yet people still screamed that we’re all doomed. Makes you wonder doesn’t it?

  • jimbo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The US just passed a $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill a few years ago for those schools and roads that are “falling apart” on top of the ~$125 billion spent annually on transportation and education at the federal level. States and local government pay another ~$700 billion per year for education and ~$350 billion per year on transportation.

    • penquin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Genuine question, where does this money go? Nothing is improving. People are still in a lot of college debt, college fees are not getting any cheaper, kids still aren’t getting free meals in schools, roads still look like shit all over the country, transportation is still absolute garbage, and don’t get me started on our healthcare system. Again, where does that money go? I really would love to know, not trying to argue, I just want to know.

      • jasondj@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        The really funny thing is that these are almost entirely domestic sectors.

        Like, seriously, investing in healthcare, infrastructure, education…these should be no-brainers. Every single dollar invested into these gets spent multiple times within American borders, through American businesses and American laborers, and has real tangible returns like “a well educated workforce (and education==higher income==higher income taxes; and also more spend on sales taxes, real estate taxes, interest, etc)” and “healthy living people” and “transporting goods and services for sale”.

        • penquin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          But you’re talking about good things. Good things means better society. Better society means more power to people which means our lords the billionaires class won’t have as much control over people to syphon more profit out of them. If you have not heard of the channel “second though”, I’d highly recommend you watch some of his videos. He’s not perfect, but he does have some good topics. One of them is this about why a lot of people are poor.

      • jimbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Genuine question, where does this money go? Nothing is improving.

        This is such an obviously untrue statement. Come on. Nothing is improving? I’m sure that it varies wildly by state and who’s running the state, but in my state it seems like there’s constantly roads, highways, bridges, etc being repaved, rebuilt, rerouted, or otherwise improved in some way. I’ve seen a few new schools pop up in my town and they’ve been working on renovating some of the older ones.

        Student loans, school lunches, public transportation, and healthcare are outside the scope of the original post that I was addressing.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Great. That’s about 5 trillion less than we need. The US Army Corps of Engineers estimates we need 3 trillion just for emergency repair projects.

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        In fairness, if you ask people of basically any industry whether their industry needs more money, they will always say yes. Teachers will always say we’re not spending enough on education, police will always say we’re not spending enough on police, business owners will always say we’re not spending enough on them, etc.

      • jimbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That seems like a total bullshit number. The closest thing I can find is from 2021 where a report from the Congressional Research Service mentioned a $109 billion project backlog for the Army Corps of Engineers.

        https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11945/2

        Edit:

        OP confused “Army Corps of Engineers” and “American Society of Civil Engineers”. He also exaggerated the bit about “emergency repairs” and neglected to mention that the $3 trillion figure was for spending over the course of a decade.

          • jimbo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The price tag to bring it into good repair? Nearly $2.6 trillion over 10 years, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers

            That’s the “American Society of Civil Engineers”, not the “US Army Corps of Engineers” like your original comment said. It’s also not “emergency repairs”. $2.6 trillion is the amount that needs to be paid for over the next 10 years to keep things in “good repair”. The $1.2 trillion takes us a little less than halfway there. Toss in the federal and local budgets for transportation and that’s another $4 trillion over the next 10 years. More than likely more money will be made available in the next decade for additional projects.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The budget was for a decade of spending. That’s how it got to be over a trillion dollars in the first place. Depending on future appropriations that may or may not occur isn’t policy, it’s just wishing.

              And yeah my memory was a little fuzzy. But it’s not exactly painting a rosy picture.