• dangblingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    173
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Genocide of our indigenous population mostly. The worst of it ended in 1996 when the last residential school closed. Basically, the Catholic Church under the authorization of the Canadian Federal Government in the 1800s and onwards, abducted children from indigenous communities, took them to boarding schools where they attempted to assimilate them into Eurocentric culture by punishing them for speaking their own language and practicing their own culture. Beatings, sexual abuse, and neglect were commonplace, with many children dying of illness, exposure, or violence. Many children survived the schools and are still alive today to tell us about it. There are also mass graves at several of these schools where children’s corpses were dumped and hidden from public view, until ground x-ray technology came around and we found the graves.

    Also, random weird fact: women weren’t allowed to have bank accounts in Canada until like 1964.

    • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      For me, in the US, Canada is like that child where, if things are quiet, you know they’re doing something bad. Because we in the US rarely ever actually hear anything bad about Canada.

    • aname@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      So this is really not about what Canada alone did, but what Catholic church and Canada did.

    • ironeagl@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      11 months ago

      Other random weird fact: Women weren’t allowed to have a bank account in the USA until 1974.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Except it was effectively true, because banks were allowed to consider marital status as a risk factor. That was made illegal in 1974. It’s in your own article.

          • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            The article says the 1974 law concerns credit applications, not bank accounts

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            Except it was effectively true,

            Only in the same way it was true that men couldn’t vote in the US until shortly before the Civil War. Because before that most states didn’t have state laws mandating that all free male citizens be allowed to vote.

        • ironeagl@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t know what to tell you. At least one of my grandmothers needed their husband’s signature to open a bank account in the 60’s, and it wasn’t because she didn’t have assets in her name.

        • GFY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Any chance you have a link to a reputable source, or a site anyone else besides you has heard of?

        • LittleHermiT@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not without their husband’s permission. That is to say, they were allowed as long as their husband was happy with their wifely performance.