• nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Is everyone still using imagemagik under the hood? I’ve been out of the web server game for a while.

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The rest of the world is catching up to the fact that containers are superior for modern, agile application deployment so nitpicking libraries is really only a thing when the security teams come knocking.

      • wewbull@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Containers are the ultimate “works for me” in software development. My experience it makes for more fragile software that depends on its environment being perfect and nothing else will do.

        • emptiestplace
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It sounds like you’ve confused containers with not containers, friend.

        • nyoooom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well no, containers allow you to know exactly the environment it runs into, no matter what the actual host environment is, you can run your program on windows, Linux, Mac or any other Docker supported system and it will work the same, I don’t see how that’s fragile.

    • drathvedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      imagemagik

      Yes, but it’s more of the middle wide block of the picture. Under it, there are quite a few tools that have been maintained by some lonesome guys since 90’s and some that haven’t been updated for years. Sometimes both. Learned about that the hard way, unfortunately.