bubstance to UnixpornEnglish · edit-21 year ago[rio] rosé p(lan9)ineimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1125arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1124arrow-down1image[rio] rosé p(lan9)inebubstance to UnixpornEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square13fedilinkfile-text
details: colors are rosé pine wallpaper os: 9front wm: rio(1) shown: bar(1) faces(1) stats(8) winwatch(1) present but hidden: riow(1) zuke(1)
minus-squarebubstanceOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-21 year agoI use all three web browsers in 9front at different times: abaco, mothra, and netsurf. My favorite is probably mothra, but netsurf handles most sites in a way that people expect (read: it supports CSS and JS). ETA: use cases abaco pros: acts like acme and supports viewing multiple pages simultaneously, best for text-only browsing cons: very basic, many sites just don’t work at all mothra pros: simple, works for a wider variety of sites, can disable image loading entirely with a flag, moth mode is great cons: no tabs, unfamiliar UI for most people, selecting text for snarfing is weird netsurf pros: most “normal” web browser, supports CSS and JS, familiar UI cons: no tabs, more bloated than other options, requires compiling a (small) web browser from source
I use all three web browsers in 9front at different times:
abaco
,mothra
, andnetsurf
.My favorite is probably
mothra
, butnetsurf
handles most sites in a way that people expect (read: it supports CSS and JS).ETA: use cases
abaco
pros: acts like
acme
and supports viewing multiple pages simultaneously, best for text-only browsingcons: very basic, many sites just don’t work at all
mothra
pros: simple, works for a wider variety of sites, can disable image loading entirely with a flag, moth mode is great
cons: no tabs, unfamiliar UI for most people, selecting text for
snarf
ing is weirdnetsurf
pros: most “normal” web browser, supports CSS and JS, familiar UI
cons: no tabs, more bloated than other options, requires compiling a (small) web browser from source