• Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s efficiency losses in order to store it, and humans don’t put out a whole lot of power anyway.

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ehh, not necessarily. Would you even recoup the energy and materials needed for such a bike? Would be a bit different if the energy was stored in something other than a battery.

        • sizzler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re already going to have the exercise bike if that’s what you want so now we are only recouping the generator and parts. Why do you hate progress?

          • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because if you can’t recoup the energy cost then it’s just more waste. I’m just saying it’s not straightforward.