As lawmakers around the world weigh bans of 'forever chemicals,” many manufacturers are pushing back, saying there often is no substitute.

  • LavaPlanet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Asbestos. You know how long they knew that was killing people? Lead, they knew that was toxic, kept using it. Business, under capitalism, is designed to find the cheapest path to pull in more money. Regardless of the consequences. Changing might not even mean all that much more, in cost. They would still act like they can’t at all, because any back slide looks bad on their charts. They have no financial obligation to the environment and or people. Change that and they’d become innovators overnight.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      1 year ago

      My favorite was white phosphorus, which caused Phossy Jaw in the employees making the matches. Switching to red phosphorus would mean a 1% increase in cost or reduction in profits (wasn’t sure which based on the article). Doing so would mean your employees’ bones wouldn’t dissolve. It took regulation to force them to switch.

    • Clegko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Asbestos is genuinely a wonderful material. It’s heat-proof, it’s a wonderful insulator, it’s one of the best filters for gas masks, it’s wonderful for use in brake pads and clutches, etc.

      It’s just a damn shame it causes cancer in living things.

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Criticizing capitalism doesn’t imply communism or socialism. You can just criticize capitalism without suggesting an alternative.

        Your jump to communism It’s like saying “I guess I have to kill myself, because some parts of life are hard.” There are other directions one could take.