Looks like all the easy definitions have been taken care of by others.
More GD&T always drives the floor jockeys piping hot mad, so do that to excess. Position at MMC, angularity, flatness of the nail head, give them the beans.
However, Having also worked with enough plant floor people-
If you don’t have a separate view showing the fully installed configuration you are wasting your time with all those notes. Nobody gonna read them.
You’re… not that far off tbh. They’re not stupid, far from it, and they’re crazy efficient, but they just do not have that refined skill of translating an implied picture into a real one. That takes a lot of practice.
That’s OK tho. It’s my job to make it as obvious as possible so such problems don’t happen.
Just today we had a technician “follow the equipment diagram”. Key word: diagram; implies drawing is diagrammatical, generally speaking. Also theres a large “NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION USE” callout in the title block. Didnt stop the tech from drilling a 7/8" hole right into the side of sensitive equipment. There’s a very obvious gland for waterproof penetration, at the bottom. So, the drawing showed a wire landing at the side of the unit, because it was easier for the layout of the diagram… yeah. I feel it.
Looks like all the easy definitions have been taken care of by others.
More GD&T always drives the floor jockeys piping hot mad, so do that to excess. Position at MMC, angularity, flatness of the nail head, give them the beans.
However, Having also worked with enough plant floor people-
If you don’t have a separate view showing the fully installed configuration you are wasting your time with all those notes. Nobody gonna read them.
*sobbing* I can’t start it until I know what it will look like when I am done.
-plant floor people probably (idk)
You’re… not that far off tbh. They’re not stupid, far from it, and they’re crazy efficient, but they just do not have that refined skill of translating an implied picture into a real one. That takes a lot of practice.
That’s OK tho. It’s my job to make it as obvious as possible so such problems don’t happen.
Just today we had a technician “follow the equipment diagram”. Key word: diagram; implies drawing is diagrammatical, generally speaking. Also theres a large “NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION USE” callout in the title block. Didnt stop the tech from drilling a 7/8" hole right into the side of sensitive equipment. There’s a very obvious gland for waterproof penetration, at the bottom. So, the drawing showed a wire landing at the side of the unit, because it was easier for the layout of the diagram… yeah. I feel it.