• trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nathaniel Veltman, 22, is on his fifth day of testifying in the trial

    Does Canada do trials differently than the US? How do you put anyone on the witness stand for five days!?

    • stillwater@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does Canada do trials differently than the US?

      Yes, Canada’s is based on the UK’s more than the US’.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The crime he committed is extremely heinous and the Crown wants to make sure their case is bulletproof. The defense is trying to make it seem like because Veltman’s mom was abusive, he read alt-right garbage online, and took psilocybin the day before, he isn’t culpable for driving down the Afzaal family. He had no choice but to kill them, it wasn’t his fault. /s

      • trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I understand it is important, and I’m certainly not criticizing anyone. I was just surprised because that is a very long time to have someone on the stand. Does Canada have protections from self-incrimination? I can’t imagine that the defense attorney would be very happy about it.

        • letstostitosalison@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lawyer here. Canada also has protections against self-incrimination and it is the same in principle as the US. In many cases where the defendant does not testify the defence strategy is poking holes in the prosecutor’s case, essentially that they have not met the burden of proof.

          Keep in mind I haven’t really been following this case, just read snippets in the news. I’m guessing the prosecutor’s case is pretty solid on its own for first degree murder convictions. His lawyer determined the best way they can counter such a strong case is for him to testify. The defence strategy is probably to get a lesser conviction (second degree murder or manslaughter instead of first degree murder) or to get an NCRMD (not criminally responsible due to mental disorder). NCRMD is the “insanity defence”. His testimony about alt-right content will probably be part of his evidence to argue NCRMD.

          A finding of NCRMD is neither a conviction nor acquittal. The person will be sent to a psychiatric hospital for however long until they deem him to be safe for release into the public, probably with supervision.

      • trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think it is prohibited. However, that is a very long time. I can’t imagine what questions they could be asking.