A prevailing sentiment online is that GPT-4 still does not understand what it talks about. We can argue semantics over what “understanding” truly means. I think it’s useful, at least today, to draw the line at whether GPT-4 has succesfully modeled parts of the world. Is it just picking words and connecting them with correct grammar? Or does the token selection actually reflect parts of the physical world? One of the most remarkable things I’ve heard about GPT-4 comes from an episode of This American Life titled “Greetings, People of Earth”.
  • rawrthundercats
    1·
    1 year ago

    Curious your thoughts about this. Not an LLM but likely using transformers in the architecture.

    • PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksBEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

      this

      Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

      I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

    • Veraticus@lib.lgbtEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      This is so funny, I know him personally; we went to school together. I’ll watch it and comment later.