• UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You’re conjuring up a false exaggerated position no one here took (“require many barriers to science”) and making dubious excuses for “shitty” science under pretense of “release all the science, shitty/false or otherwise” idealism.

    EDIT: Fine. You quoted one person. That doesn’t justify making dubious excuses for “shitty” science under pretense of “release all the science, shitty/false or otherwise” idealism.

    • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “requires many barriers to science”

      That’s a literal word for word quote from the comment I was originally replying to. I didn’t exaggerate anything.

      Is someone still publishing caliper head measurements in 2023 that you’re aware of? No. Just like no one is publishing flat earth “studies” even though some idiot members of the public think that’s fun right now. And no one is publishing about the aether. Who is the arbiter of what compromises junk science, if not the scientific community? The founder of SciHub is a communist. Release all the science.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Are you doing a blowhard long winded workaround way of calipers-free-but-still-racist “shitty” science under pious pretenses of it still being scientific enough to get attention?

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdyin6uipy4

        Who is the arbiter of what compromises junk science, if not the scientific community?

        Release all the science.

        It’s clearly a losing battle within that community if you’re making excuses for “shitty” science getting attention that it both doesn’t deserve and that will actually harm people.

        • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No more than you’re suggesting that there are racist astronomy studies being published, even though I could choose to disingenuously represent your position with that statement.

          Racist studies need to be refuted. It’s not that hard. Restricting access to all science (which I see you now notice is what that other commenter was suggesting) isn’t going to magically stop racist studies from being published.

          And again, who are you suggesting should be the arbiter?

              • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That arbiter is not doing a good job considering the proliferation of antivax, race “science,” and climate change denialism, among other things.

                Feel as above the fray as you like, but normalizing the mass distribution of junk/shit or otherwise false science under some lofty ideal of “the free marketplace of ideas will select for the correct data” is clearly, demonstratively, and repeatedly not doing that and hasn’t in the past either.

                • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You have utterly no idea what’s even present in scientific publications. Antivax and climate change denialism are not rampant in published science. They’re rampant amongst ignorant members of the public. That’s not even remotely the fault of science.

                  And here’s a summary of the current state of race science:

                  “Race does not stand up scientifically, period.”

                  https://www.scribd.com/article/350285350/What-Both-The-Left-And-Right-Get-Wrong-About-Race

                  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Someone else responded better than I could to what amounts of your wall of arrogance that was toward someone with an opinion and a take so similar to yours that it applies to you as well.

                    Every single time someone does a report on crime and breaks down data by race you’re seeing racist social science in action. The way we do clinical trials. Decisions about what to study, like the impacts of lead, or education, or pharmaceuticals, all of it lies on top of and interpermeates racist superstructure. Recent? Forced hysterectomies. Public statements from researchers that genetics are not politically correct. Mauna Kea. Environmental impact studies in Guam. I mean, it’s never ending.