deleted by creator
His point was that YouTube should not provide her a platform, whether he pursues legal action or not is separate from YouTube giving her a platform. I imagine that if he is planning to pursue legal action, he won’t be publicly talking about that for some time.
deleted by creator
She’s a known content thief and generally shit person.
deleted by creator
There’s a couple. For one, they specifically promoted her on Twitter even though she’d been monetizing the work of other people without their knowledge or consent, and her use of their videos are practically never transformative enough to fall under fair use. It may have been a while ago, but a company with very aggressive copyright practices promoting a content thief doesn’t look great.
She escalated an issue she’s having on YouTube by allegedly engaging in offline harassment and doxxing his home address to millions of her followers on Instagram. YouTube is inextricably linked to this because her videos, and his videos criticizing them, are hosted by YouTube, and YouTube is earning ad revenue from all of that. She may have used Instagram to perform the alleged harassment, but people tend to follow online personalities on multiple social media sites, so there’s definitely audience crossover.
Her audience trends young, and she’s had at least one or two videos taken down for violating community guidelines involving bullying, iirc. At the moment, there are rumors that a video of her on Omegle doing blatantly illegal shit has been reported to the FBI, and that the video had been up on her YouTube channel for nine years, though the video has since been deleted.
He’s not calling for YouTube to act just on the offline harassment, but the full collection of provable bad behaviors on the site on top of the potential harm he and his family could face as a result of her present illegal actions and access to a platform with a lot of reach.
Why is that? If she has proven to act irresponsibly on the internet and is empowered by her cloud than all platforms should take a stance. Especially YouTube because that’s her main site. It’s not like her being a dick only happens or will only happen on Instagram.
I see this sentiment a lot. Why do you think he didnt? Why wouldnt he do both?
deleted by creator
Unless she trespassed there’s nothing illegal. I don’t think she shared a specific address. It IS (was?) against the YT TOS but they only care about what makes returns for Google’s shareholders.
Daily reminder for people who mainline YouTube drama to stand up, go outside, and touch grass
This goes well beyond mere YouTube drama, I think. This is getting into the relam of actual criminal behaviour.
Stemming from…?
Doxing.
Daily reminder that calling out immoral behavior from a content thief isn’t “drama”, and minimizing it is what you’d do if you’re either a moron or stand to gain something from it.
What the hell is wrong with that commenter and people upvoting that shit. Seriously, she crossed the line and she’s playing dumb. I think he’ll end up taking her to court.
The ordeal is rather interesting but you’ve chosen the wrong community to post this to.
Went to the video and there are a bunch of bots and idiots in comment replies defending sniperwolf
They are defined in a criminal
I’m sorry, she went to this man’s house? Well now we know for sure he’s telling the truth cause he could have gotten the “medal of good jernalism”
She also doxxed him. Not only that, she already has a criminal record for aggravated assault, plus she went there at like midnight.
🍿the feud continues