• Tidesphere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hold up, if that’s the crux of his argument, does that mean that his argument is

    “I can’t be barred from running because I never took an oath to support the constitution. Therefore my inciting insurrection is not covered by this clause. But I totally incited rebellion.”?

    • TechyDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “I crossed my fingers when I took the oath of office so it didn’t count. Also, I’m rubber and you’re glue. Whatever 14th Amendment you throw bounces off of me and sticks to you!”

      -Trump’s next legal arguments…

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, I think it is “while I do not admit to starting a rebellion, whether I did or not is immaterial because ‘preserve, protect, and defend’ definitely doesn’t include ‘support’”