• BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You do not have a right to intimidate other people with a deadly weapon.

      The article specifically says she did no such thing. “At no point in time was anyone menaced or injured as a result of her possessing the firearm”

      As I said, one may exercise 1st Amendment rights and 2nd Amendment rights at the same time. They are not mutually exclusive.

      • xkforce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Best case scenario you are willingly placing yourself in a situation where you forsee the “need” to use a deadly weapon. But in that case there is no need to brandish that gun unless you want others to know you could kill them and planned for that by choosing to bring a gun which is intimidation. Especially if you are in a large crowd where people have to trust that you wont go apeshit in a place they cant escape from.