• Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because the constitution is the document that lays out the foundation for all of our legal rights and the limitations placed on the government that are intended to keep it accountable to the people. It’s not perfect, but it does cover a hell of a lot, even more gets expanded on through legislation and the courts, and when necessary it can be (and has been) amended.

    But it’s also just ink and parchment. It can’t do anything if the government decides to ignore it. It’s the people who give power to the constitution. The more it is valued by the people across the country, throughout the political spectrum, both inside and outside the halls of power, the more likely it will be that those protections are respected. And when those protections are violated, people are far more likely to push back. And many within the government are also more likely to push back. That’s literally the only reason we didn’t have an overturned election, because numerous people at all levels of government said no, many despite being aligned with the assholes that were trying to stay in power.

    So yes, I would very much prefer it if everyone would treat the constitution with some reverence if that’s what it takes. The alternative is not pretty.

    • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe.

      But we don’t have people storming the capital in an attempt to overthrow elections here (UK) and we don’t have a formal constitution.

      The two things might be unrelated.

        • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly, it’s been in continual decline my entire life. Thatcher put an end to any sense of social responsibility, New Labour ushered in the era of post-truth politics, Boris and his bunch didn’t even have to pretend that they were acting in the interest of the country.

          Anything short of full political reform will only end up being the next phase in this hell spiral.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And we did have some guys trying to storm the Reichstag in Berlin, we do have a constitution, but we don’t call it constitution and it’s also more of a permanent draft.

    • yata@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is not the issue at all though, you can change the constitution and still hold it in reverence, in fact it would probably be easier to have reverence for it if that was possible.

      The problem is that all political constructs does become antiquated over time. It needs to be updated and modernised through amendments or even a rewrite, but the way the US political system is dictated to be makes it virtually impossible to do now. Even mundane legislation cannot be passed any longer, let alone amendments. It is a problem which should have been taken care of long ago, but now it is basically too late for even the slightest attempts at tweaking it.

      • brianorca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        We do change the Constitution. 26 times so far. There is a process for it, laid out in the Constitution itself. But the process is designed to avoid being used for flavor of the week, and requires a broad consensus.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          We do change the Constitution. 26 times so far.

          Zoomers: head explodes

          We REALLY need to fund our schools