Stuff like this and the “base” he has created give off pretty harsh trump vibes. Here is a link confirming for those wanting one. Sorry I did not include it originally. https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.712106

  • kemsat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This man says hard work while looking like he wouldn’t last 3 days without all the technology that the natives used to survive without. Bruh, we know what hard work is & how to do it, we just don’t give much of a fuck about doing it on your behalf.

    So long as you’re still calling them “aboriginals” instead of I dunno like “The First Canadians,” then you’re making it crystal clear that you don’t care about them & you’re just mad that they aren’t letting you use, abuse, or manipulate them.

      • neonspool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        i’ve been raised as a Gen Z to learn “first nations”, though aboriginal (from the root word aborigine) also means the exact same thing, so i personally don’t comprehend how someone can find offense in using that word.

        maybe they are used to seeing aboriginals to describe aussi natives? still, it essentially means “first of the region”, or in other words, “first of the nation”.

        • Tarkcanis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, it’s not offensive, but technically “First Nations” is a subgroup; Inuit and Métis being the other two.

          • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            How can the Métis be “first” anything? They’re the product of intermarriage between native Canadians and European traders (mostly the French).

            • Tarkcanis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yes, that’s why First Nations refers to the folks directly decended from Native Canadians (culturally anyway), and not the Métis/Inuit.

              Ad. Yes, the Inuit are Native Canadian but they prefer Inuit, and they’re very culturally distinct. (Not that the array of first nations cultures aren’t)

              • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ah. I’d misunderstood what you meant. I thought you were including the Métis among the First Nations. My bad.

    • Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      He has never held a job outside politics so that is the reason he looks as though he has never done a days work.

      • neonspool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        indigenous, aboriginal, and aborigine, mean exactly the same thing. anyone getting offended at any of these word usages probably doesn’t know the definiton.

        • LostWon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Aboriginal should be same as indigenous, but “aborigine” is a racist term (due to historical usage) for the original peoples of Australia. I’ve never heard of it being used for anyone outside Australia.

        • iviattendurefort
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          The etymology or aboriginal is basically “comes from away”; kind of Eurocentric. Indigenous means “comes from within a place” etymologically so while it is kind of semantic it’s obvious which one is the better choice. Many indigenous people however prefer ‘Indian’ because it’s how First Nations people are referred to in the Indian Act.

          • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Aborigine” is not “comes from away”. I don’t know where you’re getting your etymology from, but it comes from the Latin “ab origine” which means “from the source” or, in context, you know, THE ORIGINALS. (First used, incidentally, to refer to the people living in what is now Italy before the Romans took it all over.)

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Aboriginal is “ab origio”, literally “from/since the origin/beginning”. Already the Romans used it in the sense of “there from the very beginning”.

            Indigenious is “indu gignere”, “begot within”. The “place” part is implicit. More of a “native” thing as in “natively born American” but the meaning shifted from the original Latin.

            Practically, nowadays, they’re synonymous. Over here we use “autochthon”, literally “self earth/soil”. Also used in geology and biology. The constitution speaks about “national minorities and ethnic groups”, going by the last recent arrivals 600 years of living here as an ethnic group suffices for autochthone minority status. Though in our case there’s no settler-colonials which of course changes the equation.

          • silentwinged@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Uh, no, many of us prefer to be called by the nation we belong to. Some of the younger ones would be really offended at being called Indian, especially by white people. Indigenous, First Nations, and native are fine - better than Indian at least.