• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh. He’s out of line. This should be a “come into my office on Monday so we can discuss the thing I saw on the internet and your future at this company” conversation that will haunt him over and over.

        • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          “come into my office on Monday so we can discuss the thing I saw on the internet and your future at this company”

          LOL. And then the employee reacts how, exactly? “Oh noes, I hope you don’t fire me, I’d hate working for more money at a company not run by someone so oversensitive”

        • 1847953620@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Haunt? Only in your egotistical dreams, bud. You’d be doing the guy a favor not working for you.

    • bitsplease
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, definetely not the time - but he’s right

        • bitsplease
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m not arguing that you shouldn’t speak I’ll of the dead or any of that nonsense, hell I was talking shit about her on the day the announced her death, you’re welcome to check my comment history. But there’s a difference between that and protesting at their funeral.

          Shes got family and friends who are grieving - and while she may have been a terrible person (and certainly was, in my view) her family isn’t necessarily, and they deserve their time to grieve as much as any of the rest of us.

          I’m not advocating for rewriting her history, either the shitty things she did in her career or the “weekend at Feinstein’s” shit that had been going on for the last decade, but a funeral just isn’t the time and the place to point out what a shitty person she was. A funeral isn’t for the dead, it’s for the living who are mourning them - and they don’t necessarily deserve to be punished for her actions.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            She is a politician. Sorry, but grieve in private then, she chose for her death to be a political act and so made her funeral a part of those politics.

            Thats not this guys fault. That was her decision.

      • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When is the time? Long enough after the next time this happens for it to be respectful and for everyone to have forgotten already?

        Nah. We’re talking. Kid done good.

        • bitsplease
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          See my comment here

          TL;DR - right now is a perfectly valid time, the day she died was also a perfectly valid time. Actually disrupting her funeral to have the discussion however isn’t. Not because it’s disrespectful to Feinstein, fuck her. But because it’s disrespectful to the people who are - for their own reasons - mourning her.

          I’m not advocating that we pretend she was a noble person or a great politician. If you wanna have a long convo right now about all her many many many faults, I’m all for it, but I don’t think it’s right to torment her family for Feinsteins moral crimes.

    • Surp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s not out of line. Many of these politician people don’t respect us in life so we absolutely don’t ever have to respect them in death.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Protesting funerals is specifically legal, shitty but legal. I’m personally fine with it as long as they’re not actively heckling funeral goers.

  • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    She’ll always have the legacy that she was too mentally incompetent to know when it’s time to retire and let the next generation take over. Worked herself to death and for what exactly

    • averagedrunk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Her and RBG really fucked up badly. But they don’t have to be here to see the fallout.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s like to know what Ruth Baker Ginsberg did wrong except die early. She was sharp up to her very last day.

        Don’t paint all old people with the same ignorant brush. Try and grow some empathy while you can still use it.

        • averagedrunk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          1 year ago

          She was 87. Yeah, she was sharp as a tack, no doubt. But 87 isn’t dying early. It sure isn’t dying early when you account for the fact that she was diagnosed with colon cancer back in 99, pancreatic cancer in 09, and had surgery in 2014 because of the cancer.

          This has nothing to do with empathy or painting old people with any brush. This has to do with the health of the nation. She could have retired during the Obama years when she was already well past the average age of death and her body was failing to enjoy a few years of retirement.

          I didn’t say everyone over 65 needs to be pushed out to sea on an ice floe. If you’re feeling like any of my words are an attack on old people maybe examine why. Because it’s showing more about you than about me.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sharp as a rusty spoon, you mean? Staying on knowing that by doing so she was handing her seat to conservatives, ruining her reputation by allowing them to shit on every career accomplishment she had?

          Real sharp. Friends like her, who needs enemies?

        • Fraylor@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah no. She’s an idiot, fienstien is an idiot too. Most old people are.

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Clarify how they’re wrong if you want to label them ignorant, please.

          EDIT: Of course they won’t…

    • escaped_cruzader@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I had known the amount of hate I’d get from “my side” if I “overstayed” my welcome I’d also cling to my post out of “fuck you too”

      One party holds on their members until their corpse rots in jail, and the other abandons them the minute it smells of fart…

      Politics are fun!

      • 1847953620@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s almost as if one side plays unfairly to the status quo and has more power, and the other side has to actively fight for and defend progress and doesn’t want to take steps backward.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you would abandon your morals if asked to give up power to prevent that power being used against your accomplishments?

        Sounds like you get along swimmingly with rgb. Power over progress was her motto too.

    • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where are you getting the racist part from? Hopefully it’s not from her issue behind removing the confederate flag from a flag display, because that had nothing to do with actually supporting that flag.

  • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If that kind of working class solidarity is “trashy” then you can call me the trash man. fuck feinstein fuck Mitch McConnell fuck any politician who holds on to power selfishly at the expense of the rest of us.

  • S_204@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    While she was a horrible ending, Ruth Bader Ginsburg was even worse. Rbgs lifetime of work was eviscerated because she was too selfish to step aside when her time was due.

    These people are the epitome of ‘you can die a hero or live long enough to become a villain’.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, at least Feinstein was always guaranteed a Democrat replacement. RBG stayed even after it was known it would be a guaranteed conservative replacement.

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Remember when Merritt Garland was supposed to be a Supreme Court justice?

      Even if RBG retired under Obama, McConnell would have done the same shit with her replacement.

      Now she didn’t know that, but it doesn’t mean we would have a better court if she had retired sooner.

      • na_th_an@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        She could have done it when she was diagnosed with cancer 9 years previously and the Democrats controlled both houses with a supermajority in the Senate and a decade past the standard US retirement age.

      • squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The argument with garland was “it was an election year”. They tried to make rbg retire well before that so at least that argument would have been different.

  • rDrDr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never support protesting funerals, so I’m not exactly a fan of this guy, but he’s not wrong.

    • averagedrunk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like 6 years ago, but she served in the Senate until September 29th.

  • Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also I dunno, don’t fly a Confederate flag in a proud union state and then try to prosecute the hero who repeatedly climbed the flag pole, tore it off and burned it.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I felt that way and expressed it on the internet but yeah not going to fucking display or bring it up at the funeral. Doesn’t this person know anything about if you don’t have anything nice to say about someone at funerals!

  • zepheriths@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like (Unfortunately) Feinstein felt that the concerns she had would not be carried to the next senator that took her place. This is the unfortunate thing about a 2 party system. Someone from the same party to take your place but none of your goals will be furthered

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A while ago she missed a months of work and when she got back she argued with reporters that she hadn’t missed a day…

      I don’t give a shit what concerns she had, she wasn’t mentally sound so it doesn’t matter what she was thinking

    • ultranaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Her remaining in the Senate looked more like elder abuse than a legitimate decision she made. Feinstein was very obviously suffering from dementia and not capable of her duties in her final years.

    • Fraylor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Bullshit, she probably couldn’t even remember the previous day nevertheless her “concerns”. Her concerns were her wealth, her status, and her power. That’s it.