• P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every couple years I interview around, I get a job offer, I take it back it my employer and they either match it or I leave.

    I don’t even have to do that. My employer always give me good raises and even better bonuses. Every year.

    Benefits are great. PTO is great. Work-life balance is great. No layoffs whatsoever. It’s not just about making money for the company and the owners, but the rest of the employees as well.

    I don’t need the strife from trying to start a union here. Save it for companies that have pushed their employees too far. Unionize where it’s going to have the greatest benefit.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ever talked to the cleaning staff how they’re faring? Your suppliers in Cambodia (or wherever)?

      It’s not that hard for capital to see reason when it comes to specialised, educated, and sometimes right out irreplaceable workers, but that doesn’t mean that capital suddenly developed a conscience.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You know perfectly well what I meant and the intent and purpose behind my comment. Try again.

          And even if you’re working in a five person co-op outfit and someone of you indeed does scrub the toilet: What about the dishwashers at that Chinese takeout you order at every other day. How does your actual supply chain look like, even if it’s pizza and coffee.

          • Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What are you arguing about exactly? Not a single comment in this chain is anti union at all, and the comment you replied to even argued for unionization where it will have the greatest benefit, i.e. all the jobs you just mentioned.

            Why are you acting like this is some sort of prisoner’s dilemma where either everyone unionizes or no one does?

              • Steeve@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Nice buzzword answer, but nobody here is against your right to unionize

                • barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  And I never said anyone was. That’s something you came up with.

                  All I wanted to do is remind people is that capital giving a fuck about your ass doesn’t mean that said capital is benevolent, or you shouldn’t organise, because it’s still going to fuck anyone over it can get away with fucking over. Like the cleaning staff.

                  • Steeve@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The decision for tech to unionize has nothing to do with how the cleaning staff is treated

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s great, I’m finally at a point in my career where I think it’ll be the same. As long as there isn’t a major culture shift, I could see myself staying at this job for the next 10+ years