• XTornado
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Interesting 🤔 yeah I saw instructions online. Idk to me it defeats the main pourpose of alerting everybody no matter.

      That said reading comments there are some examples of people having second phones hidden that could be a problem.

      • Lazylazycat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it should always be optional. We don’t have to have our TVs on 25/7. I’m certainly no tinfoil hat wearer but I don’t think the government should have access to our private spaces at all times unless we consent to it.

        • XTornado
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean is a one direction alert, that it’s intended to be only used on extreme/severe cases like if there a chemical leak where you are or a big fire or a tsunami or in worse case a missile but that last one would be uncommon for most people. Stuff that would require people to evacuate or move to safer places rather quickly.

          I wouldn’t say the government is having access to your private space, and is just an alert that you dismiss… It’s not like it’s locking down your phone or remotely accessing it or some weird shit.

          • Lazylazycat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            In some countries they are also used for missing people, train crashes, terrorist attacks, pandemic quarantine rule changes. I’m not opposed to getting this information, but I am opposed to it not being optional.

            And I have zero trust in our current government and could absolutely see it being misused down the line. But, for now, they can be turned off here.