• Mchugho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that mutuals and co-operatives do walk among us but aren’t ubiquitous tells me a lot about how effective they are.

    Why should I gamble my livelihood to participate in innovation? Well in a collective society you would be gambling the common labour and stock instead indefinitely which is also non ideal. It acts as a filter so that people are only expending time and resources on ideas that will likely take hold and provide value to society.

    • the_inebriati
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It acts as a filter so that people are only expending time and resources on ideas that will likely take hold and provide value to society.

      Do you actually believe that this filter is working as intended? Or do you think it ought to work like that?

      In a spherical society with no air resistance I can agree with you but it feels like it would be condescending for me to point out how this system that supposedly maximises value to society is in all likelihood going to kill your children’s children.

      • Mchugho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So what’s the alternative? Let anybody with any hair brained scheme they believe will be of benefit to others utilise as much labour and physical resource as possible in order to achieve their R&D goals from some central bank of resource?