Human nature as an answer is not any different from when people in the past said thunders are gods wrath and the like. Literally cavemen analysis in the goddamn 21th century.
What if we objectify and conform to our “nature” instead of being free thinking individuals? We can’t support each other and build a better future because some lobster says it’s against our nature. Disregard that they’ll also say nature isn’t real by claiming we were divinely created 6000 years ago. 🤡
Free will is when you conform to the status quo you were raised in, but you think you actually wanted to do that all along
I’m sorry but this picture is fucked. There are cut off letters and i have no idea what some of the sentences are supposed to mean. “Reification”?, “but not only to discover the”?
Sure, it’s a little jumbled, but it’s not that bad. Reification is a legit word, and that last sentence seems to be saying “only to discover that”.
Agree. I like it. Useful infographic.
Reification means to treat relations as things. In other words, to ‘thingify’.
Edit: it just looks like the typist hit ‘comma’ instead of ‘m’ by accident on the ‘…discover them’ in the last panel.
Ah, that’s a better read of the last panel!
Isn’t rape and murder part of human nature? Isn’t it also human nature to gaslight victims of the horrible things done to them?
Why should we punish doing morally objectionable things when really we should be accepting all of these actions as part of human nature. We shouldn’t enforce any standards on anyone for any reason, because all actions of humanity are of human nature. I think we should just let people do what they want unless it is helping other people in any way. Helping people out and working towards collective ends is against human nature and we should suppress and violently enforce human nature upon them.
/s in case you were wondering.
Does anyone know where to find it in the original language?
