Beijing has warned Manila not to “stir up trouble” after the Philippine coastguard removed a floating barrier at a disputed reef that was deployed by China to block Filipinos from the traditional fishing ground within their country’s own exclusive economic zone (EEZ).

What’s the history behind the dispute?

The incident occurred as tensions escalate between China and the Philippines over other areas of the South China Sea, foremost of which are the Spratly Islands.

China claims sovereignty over almost the entire South China Sea while several other countries, including the Philippines, have overlapping claims to parts of it.

Beijing’s claim that it controls almost the entire waterway was nullified by The Hague’s Permanent Court of Arbitration in a 2016 ruling, which called it groundless.

  • Badland9085@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s just the CCP imo. Most Chinese people I’ve met are just regular folks. Governments rarely represent their people culturally these days, if at all. Pretty odd when you think about it.

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Let me just interject to point out the difference between Chinese nationals and foreign born Chinese.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          No one needs that pointed out because foreign born Chinese aren’t Chinese, they’re wherever they are bornese.

          Just like how I’m not Irish despite it my parents being Irish.

          • wahming@monyet.cc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s ridiculous. That’s like telling a Jewish he’s not Jewish because he wasn’t born in Israel. Chinese is an ETHNICITY as well as a nationality. It would be nice if we had different words for Chinese nationality vs ethnicity in English (locally, we call Chinese nationals mainlanders, but that’s probably confusing given Hong Kong).

            • Deceptichum@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Jewish is a fucking religion my man, it has nothing to do with Israel. Chinese is not a religion.

              • wahming@monyet.cc
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                The Jews (Hebrew: יְהוּדִים‎, ISO 259-2: Yehudim, Israeli pronunciation: [jehuˈdim]) are an ethnoreligious group[13] and people whose traditional religion is Judaism[14][15] and whose members are successors, through descent or conversion, of the ancient Hebrews[14][16][17] or Israelites.[18][19][20] Jewish ethnicity, religion and community are highly interrelated,[21][22] as Judaism is an ethnic religion,[23][24] although its observance varies from strict to none.[25][26] The term “Jew” can encompass both individuals born into the community but not actively practicing the religion, as well as converts to Judaism.[27]

                As per Wikipedia. Seriously, do you not get the concept of ethnicities?

                • Deceptichum@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Did you even read that?

                  It literally further shows the division between being Jewish and Israel.

                  • wahming@monyet.cc
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Which was my point entirely? Dude, you’re trying to tell a Chinese guy that he needs to find a new race. Like, WTF?

    • stellargmite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Agree. It is quite an achievement for a single party to hold sway over the 1.4 billion or whatever the population is. There must be very little appetite for upheaval or instability given even recent history. such sabre rattling and the risk of actual war must be a shaky proposition internally, despite supposed levels of nationalism.

      • Badland9085@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        When you have a large population with a strongman government, having little appetite for upheavals is likely impossible. Interacting with the Chinese, I’ve learned that their government is always actively monitoring online spaces to silence dissidents amongst their own people, such that their people are used to codify their languages, and switch whenever a code gets added to the list of words that would trigger the attention of authorities. Some years ago, it was something related to meditation (it was used as a code for their gatherings), and so the Buddhists had to change the word they use to avoid unnecessary trouble with the authorities. These don’t get mentioned very often in Western news sources.

        • stellargmite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeh, the zeitgeist is also highly diverse , nuanced, layered, multi linguistic, regionalised and constantly evolving. Which I see as hopeful and isn’t what the CCP wants. Any Western generalisation especially across headlines is hardly ever accurate, but also plays to the party’s own often defensive (feelings easily hurt) public info strategies.