cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/5555641

archive.org

Developers of indie puzzle game Orgynizer have claimed that Unity said organisations like Planned Parenthood are “not valid charities” and are instead “political groups.”

In a blog post, the EU-based developer LizardFactory said the plans to charge developers up to $0.20 per install if they reach certain thresholds would cost them “around 30% of the funds we have gathered and already sent to charity.”

As Unity clarified the runtime fee will not apply to charity games, LizardFactory reached out to the company to clarify their game would be exempt from the plan.

However, Unity reportedly said their partners were not “valid charities” and were viewed as “political groups.”

Profits made from the game go directly to non-profit organisation Planned Parenthood and C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, Michigan.

“We did this to raise money for a good cause, not to line the coffers of greedy scumbags,” the developers wrote in a blog post. “We have been solid Unity fanboys for over ten years, but the trust is scattered all over the floor.”

The developers are considering a move to open-source game engine Godot, “but we will have to recode our entire game because we refuse to give you a dime,” they wrote. “This is a mafia-style shakedown, nothing more, nothing less.”

Today, Unity responded to the ongoing backlash and apologised, acknowledging the “confusion and angst” surrounding the runtime fee policy.

The company has promised that changes to the policy will be shared in “a couple of days.”

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, and Michael Jordan isn’t a former basketball player, he’s an actor! And don’t try to tell me that’s a different person, because nothing can ever be named the same as another thing!

    • PowerCrazy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      So if Unity said Michael Jordan is not a valid basket ball player, would you be up in arms about it?

        • PowerCrazy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          What if their definition of a “valid charity” doesn’t agree with yours?

            • PowerCrazy
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why? Is there some law they are breaking by having their own opinion of what a valid charity is?