pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoLinear code is more readableblog.separateconcerns.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1133arrow-down113 cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1120arrow-down1external-linkLinear code is more readableblog.separateconcerns.compnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square46fedilink cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squaremorrowindlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoLinear code is almost always easier to refactor than code split into functions
minus-squareDark Arc@social.packetloss.gglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoYeah I’m going to hard disagree with you on that.
Linear code is almost always easier to refactor than code split into functions
Yeah I’m going to hard disagree with you on that.