• HughJanus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t make much sense to me. It will be very limited in capability and it will be too heavy to wear on your face.

      One would think a video game company would make a headset that’s great for gaming, and plugs into your existing gaming rig, rather than buying a whole new gaming rig that you have to wear on your face.

      • Eggyhead@artemis.camp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I actually really want a PSVR2, but it doesn’t do anything except gaming, and I have an old VR180 camera I’d like to take traveling.

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t get what the big deal is, they dropped the Facebook account requirement a while ago and it’s easily the best headset on the market for wireless VR. You don’t even have to use their store, you can do everything in PCVR. I know everyone here hates big tech, but you’re not going to find an open source VR headset.

      • Maven (famous)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s less about it not being open source and more about it being Facebook. One of the worst companies. I refuse to strap my face into spyware.

        This is the same company that made a study on how it negatively impacted people’s lives and then purposely moved against it for profit. I simply don’t trust them to make anything with my best interests in mind.

        • TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          In Meta’s defense they have recently been super open source…but on the flip side they have ALWAYS been horrible on user privacy. Sucks, Zuck is the only billionaire that legit is a coding nerd (well not only but most prominent) and he gets tech moreso than the other leeches imo, but his disregard for user privacy makes pretty much all his efforts with Meta non-viable for me.

        • Steeve@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I refuse to strap my face into spyware

          You can just make an account not connected to you at all and only use it for PCVR. Streaming from your PC to your headset doesn’t give them any access to your PC if that’s what you’re worried about. Boycott them for other reasons if you want, but this isn’t a privacy concern.

          • HughJanus
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can just make an account not connected to you at all

            This is a very naive position.

            • Steeve@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lol wow, what an insightful comment, you put so much thought into it

              • HughJanus
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean I could write an insightful one, but it would be long. I can link you to the myriad of privacy violations Meta has implemented that make it abundantly clear that they absolutely do not give a single fuck and will hoover up as much data as humanly possible as they piss on your face and tell you it’s raining.

                • Steeve@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  15
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Then do it or write nothing at all. Calling people naive on the internet because you disagree with them doesn’t make you insightful, it makes you a dick.

                  • HughJanus
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    17
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I didn’t call you naive because I disagreed with you. I called you naive because you wrote a naive comment.

          • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They can still connect it to you by

            • gathering data on the device you use for setup
            • gathering data based off your wifi connection, local network, IP address, etc…
            • disambiguating from other possible matches based off height and other data they can access on the headset

            And even if it were anonymous, it’s very reasonable to be opposed to them having the data they can collect from the headset. Using a Facebook headset is basically like using a Facebook phone that also happens to track the movement of your head and both arms and your responses to more immersive stimulus.