Canada will change how it counts non-permanent residents, the main statistics agency said on Thursday, after an economist said the current methodology may have overlooked about a million foreign students, workers and others.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really doubt students and workers are the problem here. Perhaps Canada should look into taxing empty investment homes/condos/etc. and crack down on homes being used as hotels (like AirBnB) instead of residences.

    • redhydride
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh no, that may actually contribute to fixing the issue. We can’t do that.

      • yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Over 2,100 properties were self reported as being vacant in Toronto. No doubt in my mind many people lied and the number of vacant units sits around 3,500. Which isn’t a lot but would definitely help.

        • RehRomano@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In a city with 1.25 million homes, why are we so focused on “taxing empty investment homes” (something that already exists) for a few thousand units instead of building new homes?

            • RehRomano@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah sure. This is more a response to the top level comment (and the general sentiment) that empty units and financialization cause the scarcity, instead of just addressing the scarcity.

      • Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There are entire floors and even entire buildings sitting vacant in Vancouver because of certain foreign “investment.” They were having real estate conventions where property was being sold in a certain country sight unseen and is now just sitting there doing nothing and rotting. These “investments” were/ are merely vehicles for money laundering to get it out of a certain country. This has been basically known about for years and has been going on for years. A person making a decent wage used to be able to afford a home in Vancouver. Now, everyone is priced out of the market. The Olympics were the worst thing that probably has ever happened to Vancouver and derailed the city. Olympics were basically free advertising for foreign investment that opened the eyes of a certain country to decide to buy up anything and everything because of the lax controls in place and the politicians being cool with the grift.

        • RehRomano@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ah okay I’m asking because people seem to always point to empty homes as the problem and support that thesis with anecdotal evidence.

          The reality is new vacancy taxes in Ontario and BC captured a lot of those empty homes and there’s simply nowhere near the scale of empty homes to make any reasonable dent in the housing crisis, even if we converted every single one to occupied.

        • RehRomano@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          a) this is before Toronto instituted the empty homes tax - less incentive for homeowners to rent out their empty unit

          b) this is before the explosion of rental price increases post-covid - even less incentive for homeowners to rent out their unit

          c) measuring lights on or off a couple of times a year isn’t a great proxy for assessing empty units