The federal judge presiding over Donald Trump’s criminal election interference case shut down a bid by the former president to set his trial more than two-and-a-half years away.

This case is not going to trial in 2026,” Judge Tanya Chutkan said in a hearing Monday morning in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., NBC News reported.

But the judge also said that she would reject a proposal by federal prosecutors to bring the case to trial in less than five months.

  • nachommk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    These are state level charges, right? If he won reelection for president he could not pardon a state level conviction. Only the governor of a state can do that, which is still likely. What moving the trial would do is create a conflict for sentencing a sitting president.

    • FlowVoid@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a federal trial.

      And while some governors can pardon convictions, the governor of Georgia cannot. There is a Georgia state board that can issue a pardon, but only after a sentence has been served.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t it insane event there are so many concurrent trials Etc going on state and federal for a former president that it’s genuinely hard to keep track of them all. And his cult are ready to elect him again.

    • brandon
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      This particular trial is for the federal charges in DC.

      • nachommk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, my fault. You’re right. This is my mistake for getting confused about multiple trials.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty crazy that it’s hard to keep a former president’s federal crimes trials straight. And the guy is still leading by far in the Republican primaries. Less than ten years ago, Howard Dean’s campaign basically ended because people thought his enthusiastic yell was weird. Now we have a mess of people saying they’d still vote for Trump even if he’s found guilty. It blows my mind.

    • doggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The judge referenced in this article is for one of the federal trials. He does have charges in Georgia that he wouldn’t be able to pardon, but who knows how that would go down… leading the nation from a Fulton country correctional facility doesn’t sound like fun.