My partner keeps trying to read it and they keep stopping and reading me passages and then looking up actual historical fact and going wtf, this book is nonsense? Does it get better?

I don’t know I haven’t read it. I told them I’d ask here. Does it get better? Is it anti communist propaganda or is the ridiculous anti communist screed that starts this book serious off just setup for something better?

Thanks for all the good answers I showed them the whole thread and they said a lot of what you all said is in line with their understanding. So basically the first bit is a caricature of the bad parts of early Chinese communism and then that gets better but it turns misogynist instead. Fun series. They’ll continue to read because we have a lot of family and friends who LOVE the book and they want to understand why but it’s helpful to have the lens on it

  • JuneFall [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
    232·
    1 year ago

    Are you from the US? How often have you read stories as such for the Kent State massacre, the Battle of Blair Mountain, or the drowning of the hundreds in the Seine in Paris?

    It does more than show what was at a point in time, it is powerful propaganda, as your comment shows. Not only do you use “Mao era”, but also imply that it was awful. Which is quite a big stroke used.

    Besides that there are ways to frame scenes, the one’s in the three body problem have the problem that they are leading and are part of fiction, yet people take them for depictions of reality and construct their idea of what was from it.

    Within the CPC the Cultural Revolution - rightfully - got critiqued quite a bit and the phrase in regards to Mao of “70% good, 30% bad” is still common.