• Spzi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It depends on intent, context and scale.

    Burning books to eradicate their content is bad, yes.

    Burning a book which you just made yourself is completely harmless. Or single, mass-produced copies.

    Some Muslims will take offense when you destroy a hard drive on which you copied the Quran.

    This has nothing to do with the book burnings done by the Nazis. Their intent, context and scale was all about eradicating the books’ content.

    Or if you want, the totalitarians this time are those who play victim. They seek to oppose their value system and rules onto others, if necessary by deadly force. You better obey Islamic rule and respect the Quran as holy, or else.

    • Anticorp
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can you delete the Quran from the HDD once it is copied there, or is that blasphemy too? What about moving it from one HDD to another? Is that allowed? Or must it always leave behind a copy, like a virus?

    • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      yes it has very much to do with the book burnings of the Nazis.

      If one person is murdered in a hate crime it is not less of a hate crime because it lacked the scale.

      The intent and the targeted escalation is the same. Also it is no coincidence that there is a islamic terrorist group called Boko Haram - books are sin. It is the same idea and the same motivitation and it is always outside of democratic discourse, where criticism of a religion or its institutions is of course permitted. But burning books is not motivated to be part of the democratic discourse, but to harm democracy.