• ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s just more similar to a majority privately owned company though, as the Saudi government is just the royal family. That doesn’t mean its not a company.

    • senoro
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, but the saudi government can and do change the laws to allow the company to make more money. It’s more akin to buying shares in Saudi Arabia than it is to buying shares in a company.

      • ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As opposed to how the US government can and does change the laws to allow the company to make more money?

        Yeah, obviously it sucks to support the Saudi royal family, but honestly, it’s not any worse than buying shares in Raytheon, Northrup Grumman, Shell or BP. All of them are terrible companies doing terrible things to our world.

        • senoro
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But the US government doesn’t do they. Not really. It’s highly illegal to do it for any reason that could be seen to be personal gain. You can’t count on any other country and company to bend the rules so that the company you invest in can benefit. Every other company on this list has to follow the law or face the consequences (those consequences may not be enough but that’s a different problem).

            • senoro
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              But they don’t do they. You’re just making it up. If anything like that happens, it’s very rare and definitely not all the time.