Researchers conducted a study to see if social media could help bridge the political divide by facilitating anonymous conversations between individuals with opposing political views. The study used an app called DiscussIt, which allowed users to have anonymous one-on-one discussions about controversial topics. The researchers found that these conversations reduced polarization, particularly among Republican participants. However, there are practical challenges to implementing this approach on a larger scale, as most people do not engage in one-on-one conversations with strangers on social media. Nonetheless, the findings suggest that displaying respect for political opponents and engaging in civil conversations can make a difference in reducing polarization.
This shit gotta be sponsored by Facebook.
It doesn’t seem to be. One author declared a very small financial interest from twitter (~$2.6k) for offering expert opinions in this very subject.
I think the real point is that the current state of things with the division and misinformation is an intentional decision by the makers of current social media outlets.
The researchers show that the same medium can either sow division or reduce it.
Obviously ’they’ have chosen the worse road because increased engagement and profit are the only considerations.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Political polarization in the US has become a major issue, as Republicans and Democrats increasingly inhabit separate realities on topics as diverse as election results and infectious diseases.
Now, a team of researchers has tested whether social media can potentially help the situation by getting people with opposite political leanings talking to each other about controversial topics.
The first is the idea that simply getting people to communicate across the political divide might reduce the sense that at least some of their opponents aren’t as extreme as they’re often made out to be.
Some didn’t use the app at all and were simply asked to write an essay on one of the topics under consideration (immigration or gun control).
Both before and after use of the app, participants answered questions about their view of politicized issues, members of their own party, and political opponents.
These were analyzed in terms of issues and social influences, as well as rolled into a single index of polarization for the analysis.
The original article contains 547 words, the summary contains 167 words. Saved 69%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
