0x815@feddit.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 1 year agoAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, U.S. Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1190arrow-down10cross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksfuturology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.helvetet.euaicopyright@lemm.eetech@kbin.socialnews@kbin.socialtech@kbin.socialghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1190arrow-down1external-linkAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, U.S. Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.com0x815@feddit.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 1 year agomessage-square37fedilinkcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.worksfuturology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.helvetet.euaicopyright@lemm.eetech@kbin.socialnews@kbin.socialtech@kbin.socialghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareFaceDeer@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoThe only thing this ruling really says is “AIs are not legal persons and copyright can only be held by legal persons.” Which is not particularly unexpected or useful when deciding other issues being raised by copyrighting AI outputs.
The only thing this ruling really says is “AIs are not legal persons and copyright can only be held by legal persons.” Which is not particularly unexpected or useful when deciding other issues being raised by copyrighting AI outputs.