• LoafyLemon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Centralization is an issue, but it’s not Cloudflare to blame, it’s the ISPs and governing bodies. Consider this: who’s the one who initiated the initial block in the first place?

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You only see one side of the coin (government broke a huge swath of the internet by blocking cloudlare’s IP addresses). Now consider the other side of the same coin: when cloudlare decided it doesn’t like your IP address, suddenly you’re blocked from accessing a huge swath of the internet. This isn’t hypothetical either. It’s already happening in places with IPv4 scarcities which forced ISP to put their customers behind CGNAT. Cloudlare see this as a single IP address generating huge amount of requests, and when it blocked that IP address, suddenly a huge amount of people are blocked from accessing a huge part of the internet and instead get the dreaded captcha hell. People from US and Europe haven’t seen this issue too often because they have disproportionate amount of IPv4 allocation compared to the rest of the world, but if you want to have a taste of what it’s like running afoul with cloudlare, just use TOR or a cheap/free VPN and see how many sites suddenly become inaccessible due to cloudflare deny rule.

      • LoafyLemon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I employ VPN, TOR, and additionally, I manage sites utilizing CloudFlare. I can tell you this much: There aren’t many alternative services that safeguard your website and gather statistics while respecting the privacy of the end user. CloudFlare even provides onion routes for TOR users, which I’ve naturally activated for my website. Thus, the issue doesn’t rest with CloudFlare; it’s a tool. The true issue lies with the webmasters abusing their power and using overzealous rulesets.

        They could easily apply the same rulesets by utilizing nginx to proxy the traffic and implementing blocks on their side, avoiding CloudFlare altogether. The only distinction would be the increased expenses and a different host, nothing more.

        • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There aren’t many alternative services that safeguard your website and gather statistics while respecting the privacy of the end user.

          Well, there’s the issue. Cloudflare is hostile to user privacy, they are gathering as much data as Google and they try to gain a monopoly on all kinds of web hosting. They are the definition on an evil company.

          • LoafyLemon@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not true at all, though. I can see only the basic information, such as:

            • Page load time
            • Number of visitors per country
            • Browser header and user agent
            • Referral (if any)

            That’s all there is to it. I don’t have access to IP addresses, location data, or behavioural information. I only have access to the necessary information that enables my website to function seamlessly.

            • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t have access to IP addresses, location data, or behavioural information. I only have access to the necessary information that enables my website to function seamlessly.

              You do not, but Cloudflare does because they collect everything.