ABCnews

  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    the votes they win are votes that would likely otherwise go to Democratic candidates

    citation needed.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here’s a source for you. Note that People’s World is a socialist new organization.

      From the article, “The GOP has a long history of using the Green Party as a tool to siphon votes that might go to Democrats and of playing a spoiler role in our two-party, winner-take-all electoral system. And the Green Party leadership has opportunistically embraced the support, playing the role of what some describe as ‘useful idiots.’ […] In 2016, Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein garnered 30,000 votes in Wisconsin; Trump won the state by 23,000 votes.”

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s an entirely other way of reading that data, which is to say that Hillary could have picked up 30,000 more votes in Wisconsin if she had been a better candidate and run a better campaign.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        this does not prove that i would have voted for hilary clinton in 2016. because i wouldn’t have.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t either–I voted Green–but the state I lived in at the time went solidly for Clinton. I didn’t like her then, I don’t like her now, but if I’d lived in a state where it would have been even remotely close, I would have voted for her rather than Trump.

          I disagree with Clinton’s politics. I disagree with Trump’s existence.