• uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its no longer used in a proffesional capacity partly because its a slur (its also meaninglessly broad as a diagnosis).

    Its considered a slur because the only current use of it is as a slur

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      AKTHUALLY there are non-insulting uses, e.g. to “removed” something or saying something is a “removedant” (like a fire removedant). Yes, those are the same “removed” because if I understand correctly, that’s where the word originated from.

      I also want to point out the circular logic you have going on. It’s a slur because it’s considered one, so it’s only use is as a slur, as a result, it only gets used as a slur, so it’s considered a slur, so it only ever gets used as one.

      To be clear, that’s not disregarding what you said, but I wanted to point out a flaw in that logic.

      • uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, there are related non slur words, but those aren’t applied to people. “To removed” is a verb, not an adjective or noun. “removedent” is an adjective, but describes the action of soemething, not a quality. Using the noun or past tense adjective is the slur.

        And language doesn’t have logic. Like, its pretty weird to suggest it does. Why is fuck a curse? Because its a curse. Why do we call blue things blue? Becabse they are blue. Language and logic rarely intersect (except in lojban). Language is determined by usage, and the usage of that word as a noun is as a slur.