• gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re using an incredibly naive, reductive, and highly cropped version of history if you really think that. Or, you’re arguing in bad faith. Tankies often try to pull the latter, but it’s pretty easy to spot.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m literally the opposite by focusing on the history that led up to the conflict and the role that west played in creating the conditions for it. The incredibly naive, reductive, and highly cropped version of history is the claim that Russia just decided to invade Ukraine out of the blue and nothing could’ve been done to avoid that. The fact that you’re a grown ass adult using the word tankie says everything I need to know about you though.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re scoping the relevant historical interval to begin at 1917. I’m scoping the relevant historical interval to begin at 482. You’re taking a highly targeted and very obviously biased view of the situation.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re scoping the historical interval before anything resembling Ukraine existed, and that has zero relation to the current geopolitical conflict between US and Russia where Ukraine is being used as a proxy. Somehow, you think that’s a coherent point you’ve made.