- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
Apart from new packages (which seems like a not insignificant part of it, as you say) … has the core python language really evolved that much over time? The type annotation system would count as a heavy piece of evolution, but other than that I’d guess the roll out of new features hasn’t really transformed the core language over the years … ? Is there a chance that the core language has just aged better over time?
Yeah, I’d say barring packages, there’s a couple of other things that go into it:
Yea … all good points … still I’m thinking that the “threading the needle” is in many ways attributable to the core language and design philosophy standing the test of time (so far).
For sure; good decisions early about core design and about how to evolve are the foundations on which all else is built.
And a possible 4: runtime changes. I suspect this will become more and more apparent and important to the average user, with all the performance updates that have been coming to CPython interpreter