• Dran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Licensing is just a fancy way of saying selling you something that you don’t own.

    • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you don’t own then aren’t selling it, by definition.

      If you go to the movies, do you think that they should sell you the cinema? No, you’re for the right to sit in a seat in the theater for the duration of the movie. That’s it. You know what you’re getting and what you’re paying for. How is software any different?

      They could sell you the software, just like they could sell you the entire cinema, but in neither case can you afford it.

      • Dran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can see your argument, but I think it still stands. A ticket still qualifies as a sale. They aren’t licensing the rights to a film for an hour, they’re selling a physical voucher that grants access to a seat at a specific time during a specific showing. I own that thing and in theory, it’s irrevocable without refunding the purchase price. An operating system and a movie ticket are fundamentally different products.

        In my view, the application would be that there should not be limits imposed on the resale or transfer of said ticket once purchased. To reverse the argument, should a movie theater be allowed to sell a ticket and then revoke it without compensation if you show up in a blue shirt? Current digital licensing laws allow for the equivalent; I hurt nobody by installing windows home in a VM.