• Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems easy to strip off or not add, and then you’d have a video with unknown provenance which the echo chamber will eat hook, line, and sinker. Wouldn’t you?

    • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah this seems to presume that people care to fact check which, if these last few years have proved anything, they don’t.

      • andruid
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        People need to be educated better on it, expected to be better, etc

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah, that’s not going to be enough, well educated people fall for scams all the time.

          The best option imo is for independent organizations that people trust to handle fact checking, and have such organizations fact check each other. I also think it’s completely appropriate for the government to fact check news agencies as well, provided they don’t attempt to shut down orgs with a poor track record.

          We should still educate people better, but there’s still going to be a ton of people falling for nonsense like this.

          • andruid
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s both, uneducated people don’t have a basis to establish trust with.