(18 now actually)

  • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m pretty sure PlayStation requires games with certain types of multiplayer to authenticate with them as part of the agreement to publish on the platform so that’s restrictive.

    It sounds like that requirement is just a bad deal for the consumer. And they charge you for it. And they can’t guarantee uptime.

    • dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      From the consumer’s perspective, at its cheapest, it’s $10/month to play with your friends on PlayStation, be able to claim new games monthly which are good for as long as you are paying the subscription, and have cloud saves (among a few other minor benefits).

      No service can guarantee uptime, that’s just the reality of it. This is the largest PSN outage in 14 years. Most outages have not been this long or widespread.

      Napkin math shows their uptime to be ~99.5% in the 18 years it’s been operational. Not that good nowadays, but not something you can’t sell to people.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Cloud saves that are free on PC, and they don’t block your access to transfer saves without it like consoles do. Playing online on PC is free, and we know exactly how to make it free on consoles, but they’re not interested in doing so. No one can guarantee 100% uptime, which is why it’s a bad deal to make the subscription for that stuff mandatory instead of allowing things like direct IP connections.

        • dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          You apparently can transfer saves on PS4/5 offline. For PS4 they can be copied to a USB drive, but more to your point here, the only way to copy PS5 saves around (besides PS+) are to do console backup and restore processes and then during that process say you want to take save games wholesale (and then restore them wholesale). That’s definitely greedy bullshit.

          I don’t know what more to say, consoles are walled gardens that consumers pay to be in. Within those walled gardens, the company dictates the rules. There’s plenty of good arguments for using a more open platform like PC. Not the least of which is that PlayStation has had an abysmal console cycle for trying to prove their console is worth purchasing - what with it having basically no exclusives that won’t eventually come to PC, first-party or otherwise.

          • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            consoles are walled gardens that consumers pay to be in

            Less and less as time goes on, is my point, for the reasons we’ve discussed. Maybe any one or two of those reasons aren’t doing it on their own, but in the aggregate, it appears consumers are slowly deciding not to put up with the downsides anymore.

            • CMLVI@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              It also helps that consoles are becoming more and more PC-esque and expensive. Consoles were a good alternative because they were cheaper, had exclusive titles, and had the ability to couch game, and usually were just “pop disc in and play”. They were also pretty stand-alone devices. My biggest issue with PC gaming prior to really this generation was I cannot stand M+KB, I like sitting back in a chair with a controller. But now, peripherals are more able to operate on multiple platforms, games do cross-platform releases, cross play is more prolific (and cross-saves as of late), and it’s easier to switch now and not “lose” your friends. Plus, the cost of consoles anymore are much closer to equivalent PCs now.

              Console positives are dwindling, or at least becoming neutral to PC.

              • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Mouse and keyboard hasn’t been so much a requirement for the better part of 20 years on PC, but the rest tracks.

                • CMLVI@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  No, but I didn’t want the headache of multiple peripherals, and when you’re 15, it’s hard to convince a parent to spring for more expensive options out of convenience lol. There were options, but even still, some games didn’t come with native controller support (I built my 1st PC in college in…2013? for ESO, and the controller support was through a mod, and it barely worked at the best of times).

                  Theyve just gotten so similar in their function, it’s increasingly hard to justify a console anymore. Microsoft basically forgoing exclusives now only strengthens it