That depends on the EU country. Contrary to public perception the gap between rich and poor in Germany is about as bad as in the US. Most other EU countries are better on that metric though.
I’m Germany, if you break your leg, you’ll be mostly fine financially.
In USA, you could be in debt for years.
The gap isn’t that close.
Heck, let’s just look at ambulance cost.
In non-life-threatening situations, Germans pay 10% of transport costs, from €5 to €10.
In the USA, in one of the cheaper states, you’re looking at least at 2,000$ without insurance. Average is 5-10,000$.
With insurance isn’t much better, with a good rate being 500$ still just for the ride.
And well, you’ve seen the meme on eggs I’m the USA.
Strangely enough, even something like McDonald’s meals can more expensive sometimes in the USA then Germany.
I suppose your internet and cell data prices are similar at least.
Housing (in cities) though, is cheaper in Germany.
I haven’t even gotten into education, because I don’t know much about it, but I don’t think Germans are paying hundreds of Euros for a book, digital or physical.
The more I hear about other countries health systems the more I love the NHS. For all its faults I cannot emphasize enough about how relieving it is to never need to worry about not affording health care. I had a prolonged stint in the hospital a year or so back, more than a month, from seeing my GP, having a blood test, going to A&E, the actual stay and the copious amounts of medication I’ve been on since (and likely will be for life) I am no more out of pocket than if I’d not had a thing wrong with me.
Poverty risk is part of the direct wealth inequality. If you’re much more likely to fall into poverty, you’re going to have higher levels of poverty, and thus a wider gap
Not directly, but yes if it happens to enough people over time it can have an effect. But please see my other post further up where I looked up the actual numbers and Germany even surpassed the US in the Gini coefficient not that long ago and while the US has recently overtaken again the difference really isn’t that big.
I don’t know if others have mentioned this already, but the Gini coefficient has flaws, especially when comparing very different economic models (which the USA and Germany have). It would work better for comparing Kentucky to California for example, or Hesse to Bavaria. Not only that, but the Gini coefficient is more sensitive to changes in the middle of the income distribution than at the extremes. This means that significant changes in the income of the middle class may not significantly affect the Gini coefficient, while changes among the very rich or very poor might. It also focuses solely on relative income distribution and does not account for the absolute levels of income. Two countries could have the same Gini coefficient but vastly different average incomes, leading to different living standards.
The accuracy of the Gini coefficient also depends on the quality and comprehensiveness of the data used. In many countries, like the USA especially with its tax loopholes, income data may be incomplete or unreliable (and it’ll only get more unreliable with Musk in charge). And we already covered how it doesn’t cover issues like access to healthcare, education, etc that all cause and help perpetuate a wealth gap.
Yes I agree that it needs to be questioned, but I think you are also overlooking a lot of poverty issues in Germany. First of all the rich in Germany really like to hide their riches both practically and also in regards to taxation and secondly the majority of the people in Germany do not own the flat or house they live in, resulting in huge wealth gap and constant wealth transfer via rent payments.
I think I would agree that in terms of absolute poverty at the fringes and extreme (display) of wealth the US is much worse than Germany, but when it comes to structural inequality and near inescapable dependency of the poor in relationships that can be described as wage-slavery Germany is actually not looking good at all.
I’m not saying there isn’t a divide in Germany - there is - I’m saying there isn’t as wide a gap between the USA and Germany.
I think part of the issue with the comparison overall is the size of the two countries, as well as again that there’s things that the Gini Coefficient doesn’t factor well. USA has significant chunks of places where people own a home for example, but they are houses that would be (rightfully) condemned in Germany because they are so dilapidated and unsafe / unhygienic to live in. There are places that literally have mud floors in the state of Maine, or basements filled to the brim with toxic mold from previous floods in Mississippi. In these cases, such ownership properties become a generational burden instead, because there’s essentially no market value for them but they also require significant capital in order to repair (assuming they can be repaired).
The other thing is that while in Germany (and other EU countries) many people rent rather than own, there’s some key important differences that matter a lot here:
rent is more affordable. It can still be expensive, but the overall rent index in Germany is lower than the USA, and that’s without accounting the higher average pay Germans get per work hour.
the law to uphold the condition of rental properties is higher overall in Germany, and Germans have more renter’s rights than Americans.
you can actually buy your own apartment unit (flat) in Germany. You cannot do so in any states that I’m aware of in USA.
This is why you see massive towns of homeless people in the USA but not Germany, in part - at least people can find a place to live. And I do mean literal towns of homeless people.
Yes, you can find cheap housing in the USA too with homes that are in good condition - but they’re usually in the middle of nowhere, with essentially zero local job or business opportunities. And you have to remember that in order to travel anywhere in the USA, you will need a car.
As for the rich hiding their wealth, they do that everywhere in the world. But your tax laws are at least still stricter than the USA ones (even more so now).
Lastly, we actually agree that there’s a bigger wealth gap in the USA - that’s what the “terms of absolute poverty at the fringes and extreme (display) of wealth” indicate - a bigger gap in wealth.
What you then go on to argue about (structural inequality and near inescapable dependency of the poor in relationships that can be described as wage-slavery Germany) is actually called wealth inequity.
But on this USA has a bigger difference again as well, because things like unaffordable healthcare, education, and transportation all affect ones ability to move in the financial ladder as well.
Imagine the scenario you’re describing in that sentence, but now add that getting sick will cost you a lot, you can’t afford university, you MUST buy a vehicle for work, and there’s an increased likelihood of natural disasters ruining your things. That’s the USA.
I don’t think we actually disagree by a lot, but it is a matter of weighting I guess (and you seem a bit out of date regarding rental prices and number of homeless in Germany, both of which has increased a lot in recent years).
The main difference I see is that Germany has a lot of structural and generation spanning poverty. It might not be as bad in absolute terms when looking at people individually or looking only at the extreme fringes, but it is there and a bigger problem than in the US. So its like the risk of poverty is higher in the US, but it is actually more likely to be born into and permanently stuck in poverty in Germany.
Germany is high for Europe, but the US is crazy high for democratic and supposedly developed nations. Next year’s score is going to jump after the current administration destroys the public institutions and gives them to the oligarchy.
I’d like to see some numbers, too. I’m not really up to date, but in my understanding Germany isn’t great. But nowhere close to the situation in the US. And if I look at the list of the richest Germans, looks like it takes at least our top 10 combined together make one Elon Musk. And there’s still some Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Zuckerbergs and Larry Pages etc left and a whole Silicon Valley with the richest companies in the world.
And just from a quick googling I also find the Gini index to be different and pages like that one also say it’s a significant difference: https://wid.world/world/ especially if you look at things like the top 1%
Thanks! Seems I’d need a degree in economics to really understand this. My field is more computer science. And you oftend tend to get definite answers with that, not 10 studies with wildly different numbers, disagreeing on everything… 😒
The idea of the Gini coefficient itself is relatively simple. What I suspect is happening here is that different studies are using or weighting wealth numbers differently, most likely in regards to asset ownership (mostly housing) and thus come to different conclusions.
This is more obvious in the Europe comparison article where all the EU countries that have high rental housing rates or other severe restrictions on home ownership like Sweden are rated especially poorly.
In the US in comparison the home ownership rate is relatively high, but the quality of the housing stock is low (despite still inflated prices for them). So as others have said it is a bit of an apples and oranges comparison sadly.
Hmmh. I mean it’s complicated. Especially housing seems to work quite differently. And we often buy the whole kitchen and furniture ourselves even while renting. Plus the entire house is made of different material, like bricks and mortar. I’m not sure how that translates into cost and value of the house. But yeah, I’m not sure what my question is. These numbers all have their merit and use cases but there’s a lot of things involved. Maybe I just like to live a comfortable life rather than work my butt off for 80h a week to own a lot of assets to rent out. I’m not sure. I think my main thing is it needs to be sustainable. We can’t have a small minority “owning” the country. There needs to be a middle class, and the poor people need to be able to sustain a living without working several jobs without a perspective in life. That’d be great. I’m not super concerned with the numbers themselves, but more with the resulting effect they have on society and life. And I suppose that’s hard to quantify.
I often get the feeling that it’s far more accepted in the USA that rich people get to decide. And large companies are allowed to rip off the citizens, be it privacy, labor law, healthcare. And the atmosphere in Europe is a bit different and we do way more regulation to try to even out things in a more socialist(?) way. But that doesn’t mean it neccesarily turns out that way.
That depends on the EU country. Contrary to public perception the gap between rich and poor in Germany is about as bad as in the US. Most other EU countries are better on that metric though.
Hi, yeah, been to both to keep it short.
I’m Germany, if you break your leg, you’ll be mostly fine financially.
In USA, you could be in debt for years.
The gap isn’t that close.
Heck, let’s just look at ambulance cost.
In non-life-threatening situations, Germans pay 10% of transport costs, from €5 to €10.
In the USA, in one of the cheaper states, you’re looking at least at 2,000$ without insurance. Average is 5-10,000$.
With insurance isn’t much better, with a good rate being 500$ still just for the ride.
And well, you’ve seen the meme on eggs I’m the USA. Strangely enough, even something like McDonald’s meals can more expensive sometimes in the USA then Germany.
I suppose your internet and cell data prices are similar at least.
Housing (in cities) though, is cheaper in Germany.
I haven’t even gotten into education, because I don’t know much about it, but I don’t think Germans are paying hundreds of Euros for a book, digital or physical.
Again, The gap isn’t that close.
The more I hear about other countries health systems the more I love the NHS. For all its faults I cannot emphasize enough about how relieving it is to never need to worry about not affording health care. I had a prolonged stint in the hospital a year or so back, more than a month, from seeing my GP, having a blood test, going to A&E, the actual stay and the copious amounts of medication I’ve been on since (and likely will be for life) I am no more out of pocket than if I’d not had a thing wrong with me.
That’s the poverty risk and I agree that this is lower in Germany, but it says very little about the direct wealth inequality.
Poverty risk is part of the direct wealth inequality. If you’re much more likely to fall into poverty, you’re going to have higher levels of poverty, and thus a wider gap
Not directly, but yes if it happens to enough people over time it can have an effect. But please see my other post further up where I looked up the actual numbers and Germany even surpassed the US in the Gini coefficient not that long ago and while the US has recently overtaken again the difference really isn’t that big.
I don’t know if others have mentioned this already, but the Gini coefficient has flaws, especially when comparing very different economic models (which the USA and Germany have). It would work better for comparing Kentucky to California for example, or Hesse to Bavaria. Not only that, but the Gini coefficient is more sensitive to changes in the middle of the income distribution than at the extremes. This means that significant changes in the income of the middle class may not significantly affect the Gini coefficient, while changes among the very rich or very poor might. It also focuses solely on relative income distribution and does not account for the absolute levels of income. Two countries could have the same Gini coefficient but vastly different average incomes, leading to different living standards.
The accuracy of the Gini coefficient also depends on the quality and comprehensiveness of the data used. In many countries, like the USA especially with its tax loopholes, income data may be incomplete or unreliable (and it’ll only get more unreliable with Musk in charge). And we already covered how it doesn’t cover issues like access to healthcare, education, etc that all cause and help perpetuate a wealth gap.
Yes I agree that it needs to be questioned, but I think you are also overlooking a lot of poverty issues in Germany. First of all the rich in Germany really like to hide their riches both practically and also in regards to taxation and secondly the majority of the people in Germany do not own the flat or house they live in, resulting in huge wealth gap and constant wealth transfer via rent payments.
I think I would agree that in terms of absolute poverty at the fringes and extreme (display) of wealth the US is much worse than Germany, but when it comes to structural inequality and near inescapable dependency of the poor in relationships that can be described as wage-slavery Germany is actually not looking good at all.
I think there’s some misunderstanding.
I’m not saying there isn’t a divide in Germany - there is - I’m saying there isn’t as wide a gap between the USA and Germany.
I think part of the issue with the comparison overall is the size of the two countries, as well as again that there’s things that the Gini Coefficient doesn’t factor well. USA has significant chunks of places where people own a home for example, but they are houses that would be (rightfully) condemned in Germany because they are so dilapidated and unsafe / unhygienic to live in. There are places that literally have mud floors in the state of Maine, or basements filled to the brim with toxic mold from previous floods in Mississippi. In these cases, such ownership properties become a generational burden instead, because there’s essentially no market value for them but they also require significant capital in order to repair (assuming they can be repaired).
The other thing is that while in Germany (and other EU countries) many people rent rather than own, there’s some key important differences that matter a lot here:
This is why you see massive towns of homeless people in the USA but not Germany, in part - at least people can find a place to live. And I do mean literal towns of homeless people.
Yes, you can find cheap housing in the USA too with homes that are in good condition - but they’re usually in the middle of nowhere, with essentially zero local job or business opportunities. And you have to remember that in order to travel anywhere in the USA, you will need a car.
As for the rich hiding their wealth, they do that everywhere in the world. But your tax laws are at least still stricter than the USA ones (even more so now).
Lastly, we actually agree that there’s a bigger wealth gap in the USA - that’s what the “terms of absolute poverty at the fringes and extreme (display) of wealth” indicate - a bigger gap in wealth.
What you then go on to argue about (structural inequality and near inescapable dependency of the poor in relationships that can be described as wage-slavery Germany) is actually called wealth inequity.
But on this USA has a bigger difference again as well, because things like unaffordable healthcare, education, and transportation all affect ones ability to move in the financial ladder as well.
Imagine the scenario you’re describing in that sentence, but now add that getting sick will cost you a lot, you can’t afford university, you MUST buy a vehicle for work, and there’s an increased likelihood of natural disasters ruining your things. That’s the USA.
I don’t think we actually disagree by a lot, but it is a matter of weighting I guess (and you seem a bit out of date regarding rental prices and number of homeless in Germany, both of which has increased a lot in recent years).
The main difference I see is that Germany has a lot of structural and generation spanning poverty. It might not be as bad in absolute terms when looking at people individually or looking only at the extreme fringes, but it is there and a bigger problem than in the US. So its like the risk of poverty is higher in the US, but it is actually more likely to be born into and permanently stuck in poverty in Germany.
Germany is high for Europe, but the US is crazy high for democratic and supposedly developed nations. Next year’s score is going to jump after the current administration destroys the public institutions and gives them to the oligarchy.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/gini-coefficient-by-country
That website has some slightly odd figures (from the CIA 🤔), need to look up a better source some time when I have more time.
I’d like to see some numbers, too. I’m not really up to date, but in my understanding Germany isn’t great. But nowhere close to the situation in the US. And if I look at the list of the richest Germans, looks like it takes at least our top 10 combined together make one Elon Musk. And there’s still some Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Zuckerbergs and Larry Pages etc left and a whole Silicon Valley with the richest companies in the world.
And just from a quick googling I also find the Gini index to be different and pages like that one also say it’s a significant difference: https://wid.world/world/ especially if you look at things like the top 1%
For a quick overview on the wealth inequality in Europe, this article is good.
I looked up their source, which is the UBS’s Global Wealth Report 2023.
On page 33 there is this table that compares Gini coefficient between major economies over the last 20 years including the US and Germany:
As you can see Germany even surpassed the US in the early 2000, but since then the US overtook, but the difference isn’t huge.
I have honestly no idea where the CIA gets their data from, but I don’t think they are a very trustworthy source.
Thanks! Seems I’d need a degree in economics to really understand this. My field is more computer science. And you oftend tend to get definite answers with that, not 10 studies with wildly different numbers, disagreeing on everything… 😒
The idea of the Gini coefficient itself is relatively simple. What I suspect is happening here is that different studies are using or weighting wealth numbers differently, most likely in regards to asset ownership (mostly housing) and thus come to different conclusions.
This is more obvious in the Europe comparison article where all the EU countries that have high rental housing rates or other severe restrictions on home ownership like Sweden are rated especially poorly.
In the US in comparison the home ownership rate is relatively high, but the quality of the housing stock is low (despite still inflated prices for them). So as others have said it is a bit of an apples and oranges comparison sadly.
Hmmh. I mean it’s complicated. Especially housing seems to work quite differently. And we often buy the whole kitchen and furniture ourselves even while renting. Plus the entire house is made of different material, like bricks and mortar. I’m not sure how that translates into cost and value of the house. But yeah, I’m not sure what my question is. These numbers all have their merit and use cases but there’s a lot of things involved. Maybe I just like to live a comfortable life rather than work my butt off for 80h a week to own a lot of assets to rent out. I’m not sure. I think my main thing is it needs to be sustainable. We can’t have a small minority “owning” the country. There needs to be a middle class, and the poor people need to be able to sustain a living without working several jobs without a perspective in life. That’d be great. I’m not super concerned with the numbers themselves, but more with the resulting effect they have on society and life. And I suppose that’s hard to quantify.
I often get the feeling that it’s far more accepted in the USA that rich people get to decide. And large companies are allowed to rip off the citizens, be it privacy, labor law, healthcare. And the atmosphere in Europe is a bit different and we do way more regulation to try to even out things in a more socialist(?) way. But that doesn’t mean it neccesarily turns out that way.