not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 16 hours agorulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1149arrow-down110
arrow-up1139arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 16 hours agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours ago Labels are so limiting. right. so you would fit into a group that’s less chokehold strict than straight.
minus-squareScott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours agoSo I considered the idea that I might be bi, but I’m only attracted to men who are very effeminate and present as women and even then only sometimes, so that doesn’t really fit.
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours agosure. I’m in a similar but not identical type of sexuality, I prefer the idea “non zero” and call it a day. IDK, like “pansexual-lite” or something. I’m not bi, but I’m not completely straight and that’s ok.
minus-squareScott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoExactly! Now put on that dress.
right. so you would fit into a group that’s less chokehold strict than straight.
So I considered the idea that I might be bi, but I’m only attracted to men who are very effeminate and present as women and even then only sometimes, so that doesn’t really fit.
sure. I’m in a similar but not identical type of sexuality, I prefer the idea “non zero” and call it a day. IDK, like “pansexual-lite” or something.
I’m not bi, but I’m not completely straight and that’s ok.
Exactly! Now put on that dress.