The European Comission has granted €20 million to STEP, the European consortium that will create the AI model. It will be open source, European regulations-compliant and unlike Deepseek, its dataset will also be open source and will be trained in 35 languages.

  • bruce965
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I am conflicted about this choice. I am happy that the EU Commission will invest funds into open source technologies, but at the same time the US and China are already investing enough into “free as in free beer” models. Is it really worth it building yet another model?

    Why not fund open source software development instead of funding machine learning? €20 million would do miracles divided between a few teams of developers, but they might merely be bread crumbs for machine learning training.

    • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      2 main issues with the lack of Euro models: 1) Performance of all SOTA models is much better in English. 2) US models have US values. It’s yet another tool to culturally assimilate Europe (and the rest of the world too)

    • Anyone@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Is it really worth it building yet another model?

      Yes, it is, and it has to do with independence and many other reasons. It’ll be multilingual, legally compliant, it comes without Chinese nor other censorship, it is open source unlike Deepseek, ChatGPT, and others.

      • bruce965
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Mmh, okay that makes sense. Especially the multilinguality would be pretty important. As for the legality, we’ll see how it goes. Do we even know if it’s really possible to build a good model with only legally acquired data?

        As for the censorship, as far as I know, for DeepSeek’s models it’s injected in the prompt after the training is completed, so it shouldn’t really be censored if you run it locally.

        But yeah, you have raised good points. Thanks.

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That money should definitely go towards funding sovereign cloud infrastructure and open source software instead of vaporware AI bullshit. Where will you run your LLMs if you have no infra…

      • albert180@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        We already have sovereign Cloud Infrastructure (OVH, Scaleway etc…)

        Most people use AWS, Azure and Google Cloud because of Resume Driven Development and nobody got fired for buying AWS, and most of them probably don’t need them

        • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Nobody in Europe can realistically compete with AWS, GCP or Azure. Especially not OVH. They mostly focus on small and medium businesses and I wouldn’t trust them for large scale operations like the ones you can do on AWS. They had one too many dumb problems caused by poor design/decisions.
          Maybe I should have been more precise: we don’t have sovereign hyperscalers in Europe.